Orchardgrass Production as Affected by Irrigation and Shade Regimes in Agrivoltaics
Orchardgrass Production in Agrivoltaics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52825/agripv.v4i.2838Keywords:
Orchardgrass, Irrigation, AgrivoltaicsAbstract
With the growing interest and research into agrivoltaic systems, new designs simultaneously emerge. This study focuses on one of these emerging designs in Oregon, USA and the effects that differing shade and irrigation regimes may have on plant productivity, nitrogen and water use efficiency (WUE), nutritive value parameters and seasonality within the array of an orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata) crop. Three irrigation regimes were selected and names based on replacement of daily evapotranspiration values (ET): 100% daily ET replacement (I100), 50% daily ET replacement (I50), and no irrigation (I0). Additionally, three distinct shade zones were identified within the agrivoltaics array: eastern, western, and center. Full irrigation (I100) resulted in increased yields (P<0.01) while shade regime had no impact (P=0.21) on overall yield. Additionally, all irrigation regimes resulted in a decrease in WUE (P<0.01) when compared to no irrigation application. Total annual crude protein production was also affected by irrigation application with the highest crude protein produced in I100 and lowest produced in I0 (P<0.001). On a seasonal basis, both I100 and I50 irrigation regimes increased daily growth rates (P<0.01). These results indicate that alterations of microclimates [e.g. soil temp, moisture, PAR]may be occurring when shade and irrigation treatments are combined, causing effects on the plants that are grown with agrivoltaic systems. Further research may indicate which parameters are being affected most, leading to the results seen in this study.
Downloads
References
[1] G.A., Barron-Gafford, M.A. Pavao-Zuckerman, R.L. Minor, L.F. Sutter, I. Barnett-Moreno, D.T. Blackett, M. Thompson, K. Dimond, A.K. Gerlak, G.P. Nabhan, & J.E. Macknick, “Agrivoltaics Provide Mutual Benefits Across the Food-Energy-Water Nexus in Drylands,” Nature Sustainability, 2, pp.848-855. Sept, 2019.
[2] A. Weselek, A. Bauerle, J. Hartung, S. Zikeli, I. Lewandowski, & P. Högy, “Agrivoltaic System Impacts on Microclimate and Yield of Different Crops Within an Organic Crop Rotation in a Temperate Climate,” Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 41. Aug, 2021.
[3] J. Widmer, B. Christ, J. Grenz, & L. Norgrove, “Agrivoltaics, a Promising New tool for Electricity and Food Production: A Systematic Review,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 192. March, 2024.
[4] K.W. Proctor, “Harvesting Sunshine: A Modular Integrated Framework for Modeling the Agrivoltaic System,” Doctoral Thesis, Oregon State University. 2022.
[5] M. Tsubo, & S. Walker, “Relationships Between Photosynthetically Active Radiation and Clearness Index at Bloemfontein, South Africa,” Theor. Appl. Climatol., 80, pp. 17-25. Sept, 2004, doi: 10.1007/s00704-004-0080-5.
[6] S. Ates, A. Seeno, A., J.W. MacAdam, & D.J. Moot, “Exploring Clover-Based Nurse Cropping for Birdsfoot Trefoil Establishment and Yield,” Grass and Forage Science, 80. Feb, 2025, doi: 10.1111/gfs.12710.
[7] A. Mills, D.J. Moot, & P.D. Jamieson, “Quantifying the Effect of Nitrogen on Productivity of Cocksfoot,” European Journal of Agronomy, 30, pp. 63-69. Feb, 2009.
Published
How to Cite
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Haley Kirschten, Chad Higgins, Kevin Carver, Serap Kizil Aydemir, Jennifer MacAdam, Serkan Ates

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Accepted 2026-05-05
Published 2026-08-26