CFD Modelling and Multi-Objective Optimization of a Segmented Open Sorption Heat Storage

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52825/isec.v2i.3377

Keywords:

Adsorption heat storage, Segmented reactor, Modular Design, Computational fluid dynamics (CFD), Response surface methodology (RSM), Multi-objective optimization

Abstract

Sorption heat storage offers high energy density and low thermal losses, making it attractive for short-term and seasonal solar heat storage in buildings. However, implementation depends on reactor design, particularly in terms of scalability, flow distribution, and pressure losses. Modular open-reactor designs improve scalability, while internal segmentation can reduce pressure drop by shortening the flow path. However, segmentation may also cause non-uniform heat and mass distribution, leading to outlet-temperature non-uniformity and less reliable heat delivery. This paper combines a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model of a segmented reactor with response surface methodology (RSM)-based multi-response optimization of key design variables. Coupled heat and mass transfer in a zeolite packed bed is simulated using adsorption equilibrium and kinetic relations. A central composite design (CCD) samples the geometry space, and quadratic response-surface models are developed for energy storage density, useful recovered energy, pressure drop, average outlet temperature, outlet-temperature non-uniformity, the 95% threshold temperature, and the corresponding duration above this threshold. The surrogate models are evaluated using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and diagnostic checks. A desirability-function approach combines the seven responses into a single objective and identifies high-desirability geometries under an approximately constrained module envelope. The optimized CFD-confirmed design increased useful recovered energy by 18.28%, energy storage density by 5.21%, reduced outlet-temperature non-uniformity by 70.25%, and extended the duration above the 95% temperature threshold by 34.65%, with only a 10% increase in pressure drop. These results demonstrate that the proposed CFD–RSM framework is an efficient, reliable approach for multi-objective optimization of sorption reactors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] H. Ayaz, V. Chinnasamy, J. Yong, and H. Cho, “Review of Technologies and Recent Advances in Low-Temperature Sorption Thermal Storage Systems,” Energies, vol. 14, no. 19, p. 6052, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.3390/en14196052.

[2] Ch. Reichl, D. Lager, G. Englmair, B. Zettl, and M. Popovac, “Fluid dynamics simulations for an open-sorption heat storage drum reactor based on thermophysical kinetics and experimental observations,” Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 107, pp. 994–1007, Aug. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.06.119.

[3] P. Hu et al., “Thermal performance analysis of the sorption heat storage system with packed bed based on a spatially resolved 2D model,” Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, vol. 49, p. 101753, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2021.101753.

[4] R. van Alebeek, L. Scapino, M. A. J. M. Beving, M. Gaeini, C. C. M. Rindt, and H. A. Zondag, “Investigation of a household-scale open sorption energy storage system based on the zeolite 13X/water reacting pair,” Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 139, pp. 325–333, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.04.092.

[5] F. Kuznik, D. Gondre, K. Johannes, C. Obrecht, and D. David, “Numerical modelling and investigations on a full-scale zeolite 13X open heat storage for buildings,” Renewable Energy, vol. 132, pp. 761–772, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.07.118.

[6] E. Abohamzeh and G. Frey, “Numerical Investigation of the Adsorption Process of Zeolite/Water in a Thermochemical Reactor for Seasonal Heat Storage,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 16, p. 5944, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.3390/en15165944.

[7] Y. Wang et al., “Numerical modeling and performance analysis of an open sorption energy storage system based on zeolite/water in building heating,” Energy, vol. 306, p. 132430, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.132430.

[8] E. Abohamzeh, S. E. Hosseinizadeh, and G. Frey, “Numerical investigation and response surface optimization of a sorption heat storage systems performance using Y-shaped fins,” Journal of Energy Storage, vol. 84, p. 110803, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.est.2024.110803.

[9] K. Kant, A. Shukla, D. M. J. Smeulders, and C. C. M. Rindt, “Analysis and optimization of the closed-adsorption heat storage bed performance,” Journal of Energy Storage, vol. 32, p. 101896, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.est.2020.101896.

[10] Kerskes, Henner; Weber, Rebecca; Barrena, Oitz; Drück, Harald, “Development of a Segmented Sorption Store within the Project ‘SolSpaces,’” in EuroSun 2014 (ISES Conference Proceedings), Aix-les-Bains, France: International Solar Energy Society (ISES), Sep. 2014. [Online].

[11] E. Abohamzeh, D. Theis, and G. Frey, “Exploring the potential of a novel segmented concept of real-scale open sorption storage via CFD modeling and performance evaluation,” Front. Energy Res., vol. 13, Feb. 2026, doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2025.1726701.

[12] Farisy, Amine, “Einsatz von offenen Adsorptionsspeichersystemen zur Langzeit- bzw. saisonalen Speicherung solarer Wärme in Wohngebäuden,” Master’s thesis, htw saar – Hochschule für Technik und Wirtschaft des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken, 2022.

[13] B. P. Bering, M. M. Dubinin, and V. V. Serpinsky, “Theory of volume filling for vapor adsorption,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 378–393, Apr. 1966, doi: 10.1016/0095-8522(66)90004-3.

[14] D. D. Do, Adsorption Analysis: Equilibria And Kinetics (With Cd Containing Computer Matlab Programs). World Scientific, 1998.

[15] D. Bathen and M. Breitbach, Adsorptionstechnik. Springer-Verlag, 2013.

[16] Kast, W., Adsorption aus der Gasphase. Ingenieurwissenschaftliche Grundlagen und technische Verfahren. Weinheim, Germany: Verlag Chemie.

[17] B. Mette, “Experimentelle und numerische Untersuchungen zur Reaktionsführung thermochemischer Energiespeicher,” 2014, Accessed: Mar. 01, 2026. [Online]. Available: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:93-opus-95635

Downloads

Published

2026-05-29

How to Cite

Abohamzeh, E., Tajik Jamalabad, M., & Frey, G. (2026). CFD Modelling and Multi-Objective Optimization of a Segmented Open Sorption Heat Storage. International Sustainable Energy Conference - Proceedings, 2. https://doi.org/10.52825/isec.v2i.3377

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Future District Heating and Cooling