Impact of Building Design Variables on Demand Response Capability Considering Local Grid Profiles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52825/isec.v2i.3381Keywords:
Demand Response, Key Performance Indicators, Spatial Energy Planning, Grid Stress IndexAbstract
The increasing share of volatile renewable energy sources like wind- and solar power poses challenges for balancing supply and demand in electrical power systems. Demand response is considered a promising strategy to address this issue, creating a need for evaluation metrics that assess grid participants’ ability to effectively apply demand response strategies. Many existing approaches rely on indicators focusing on energy costs, efficiency, or greenhouse gas emissions, while the impact on local grid stress remains insufficiently captured. To address this gap, this work introduces the Grid Stress Index (GSI), an evaluation metric that enables benchmarking of a building’s contribution to local grid stress by weighting its consumption and production behavior with the normalized load profile at a reference grid node, such as a transformer or substation. We demonstrate the method in a simplified simulation environment with a direct-optimization based building control strategy that implements load shifting by preheating. A use case illustrates how the metric can evaluate the impact of building design parameters (such as insulation thickness and thermal mass) to load shifting potential. Results show that the GSI captures the beneficial effects of increased insulation and thermal mass, while also revealing non-additive interactions between these parameters. Furthermore, the location awareness of the metric is demonstrated by evaluating the installation of photovoltaic systems in two distinct grid contexts, revealing how the same intervention can either mitigate or increase local gridstress.
Downloads
References
[1] P. Denholm and M. Hand, “Grid flexibility and storage required to achieve very high penetration of variable renewable electricity,” Energy Policy, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 1817–1830, Mar. 2011, ISSN: 03014215. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.01.019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.01.019
[2] H. Lund and E. M¨unster, “Integrated energy systems and local energy markets,” Energy Policy, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 1152–1160, Jul. 2006, ISSN: 03014215. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.10.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.10.004
[3] X. Cao, X. Dai, and J. Liu, “Building energy-consumption status worldwide and the state-of-the-art technologies for zero-energy buildings during the past decade,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 128, pp. 198–213, Sep. 2016, ISSN: 03787788. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.06.089. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.06.089
[4] GFBAE project page (german), 2025. Accessed: Mar. 10, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://projekte.ffg.at/projekt/5124463.
[5] H. Li, Z. Wang, T. Hong, and M. A. Piette, “Energy flexibility of residential buildings: A systematic review of characterization and quantification methods and applications,” Advances in Applied Energy, vol. 3, p. 100 054, Aug. 2021, ISSN: 26667924. DOI: 10.1016/j.adapen.2021.100054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adapen.2021.100054
[6] R. G. Junker et al., “Characterizing the energy flexibility of buildings and districts,” Applied Energy, vol. 225, pp. 175–182, Sep. 2018, ISSN: 03062619. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.037. Hinterseer et al. | ISEC 2026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.037
[7] J. Le Dr ´eau and P. Heiselberg, “Energy flexibility of residential buildings using short term heat storage in the thermal mass,” Energy, vol. 111, pp. 991–1002, Sep. 2016, ISSN: 03605442. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.05.076. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.05.076
[8] G. Reynders, J. Diriken, and D. Saelens, “Generic characterization method for energy flexibility: Applied to structural thermal storage in residential buildings,” Applied Energy, vol. 198, pp. 192–202, Jul. 2017, ISSN: 03062619. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.04.061. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.04.061
[9] Bundesverband der Energie- und Wasserwirtschaft (BDEW), Standardlastprofile strom – anwendungshilfe, 2025. Accessed: Mar. 10, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.bdew.de/energie/standardlastprofile-strom/.
[10] S. Pfenninger and I. Staffell, “Long-term patterns of european PV output using 30 years of validated hourly reanalysis and satellite data,” Energy, vol. 114, pp. 1251–1265, Nov. 2016, ISSN: 03605442. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.08.060. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.08.060
[11] S. Pffenninger and I. Staffel, Renewables.ninja. Accessed: Mar. 6, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.renewables.ninja.
[12] International Organization for Standardization (ISO), “Energy performance of buildings - overarching EPB assessment,” Geneva, Switzerland, ISO 52000-1:2017, 2017
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Simon Hinterseer, Maximilian Neusser, Andreas Sarkany, Florian Schnabel, Sabine Sint, Thomas Bednar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Funding data
-
Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft
Grant numbers FO999913325 -
Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft
Grant numbers FO999931939