Insights on Modelling Practices and Tool Preferences

Results of a Public Survey in the Energy Domain

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52825/ocp.v9i.3295

Keywords:

Energy, Modelling, Tool, Preference, Survey

Abstract

We present results of a public survey on modelling practices and tool preferences, in the energy domain. The survey covered experiences with and usage of programming languages and models, model selection criteria, software development practices, and model interoperation. Our findings are contrasted by an assessment of openly available energy tools.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] S. Pfennigner et al., “Opening the black box of energy modelling: Strategies and lessons learned”, Energy Strategy Reviews 19, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2017.12.002

[2] Open Energy Modelling Tool Tracker. https://openmod-tracker.org/ (accessed November 24th, 2025)

[3] F. Scheller et al., “An expert survey to assess the current status and future challenges of energy system analysis”, Smart Energy 4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.segy.2021.100057

[4] LF Energy Landscape. https://lfenergy.landscape2.io/ (accessed November 24th, 2025)

[5] F. Wiese et al., “A qualitative evaluation approach for energy system modelling frameworks”, Energy, Sustainability and Society 8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-018-0154-3

[6] S. Pfenninger, “Open code and data are not enough: understandability as design goal for energy system models”, Progress in Energy 6(3), 2024, https://doi.org/10.1088/2516-1083/ad371e

[7] S. Ferenz et al., “Ten Recommendations for Engineering Research Software in Energy Research“, E-Energy ’25 Proceedings, 2025, https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3679240.3734606

[8] openmod Forum. https://forum.openmod.org (accessed November 20th, 2025)

[9] Strommarkttreffen. https://www.strommarkttreffen.org (accessed November 20th, 2025)

[10] NFDI4Energy. https://nfdi4energy.uol.de (accessed November 20th, 2025)

[11] C. Schimeczek, F. Nitsch, D. Zapf, “Insights on Modelling Practices and Tool Preferences (Dataset)”, Zenodo, 2025, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17659978

Published

2026-03-23

How to Cite

Schimeczek, C., Nitsch, F., & Zapf, D. (2026). Insights on Modelling Practices and Tool Preferences: Results of a Public Survey in the Energy Domain. Open Conference Proceedings, 9. https://doi.org/10.52825/ocp.v9i.3295

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Proceedings to the 3rd NFDI4Energy Conference - Full Papers