Harmonizing Energy System Scenario Data Through Ontological Annotation: A Case Study Within the NFDI4Energy Ecosystem

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52825/ocp.v9i.3310

Keywords:

Energy System Models, Ontology, FAIR Data, Semantic Annotation, Scenario Comparison

Abstract

Long‑term energy scenario studies based on Energy System Optimization Models (ESOMs) play a central role in shaping the transition of the German energy system. However, the diversity of model structures and variable naming conventions complicate cross‑study comparison and limits reproducibility. This work presents an approach for improving the interoperability of scenario data through the use of ontologically annotated datasets.
Within the NFDI4Energy framework, we conducted a case study that tested a set of semantic tools and workflows on data from the Ariadne project, which employs the models REMod, REMIND, and PyPSA‑DE [1]. Using the Open Energy Ontology (OEO), the TIB Terminology Service, and the NFDI4Energy Annotator, we developed and evaluated a practical procedure for annotating energy scenario data in the IAMC format [2], [3]. The results demonstrate that automated suggestion tools substantially reduce manual effort while maintaining semantic quality after expert review. The documented workflow and derived recommendations aim to support scientists in performing transparent, reproducible, and machine‑readable energy scenario analysis

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] G. Luderer et al., A cost-efficient energy transition: Scenarios for climate neutrality 2045 – summary, Ariadne-Report, 2025.

[2] M. Booshehri et al., "Introducing the open energy ontology: Enhancing data interpretation and interfacing in energy systems analysis", Energy and AI, vol. 5, p. 100 074, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyai.2021.100074.

[3] International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. "IAMC Data Format Repository", Accessed: Dec. 8, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/IAMconsortium/common-definitions

[4] M. G. Prina, B. Nastasi, D. Groppi, S. Misconel, D. A. Garcia, and W. Sparber, "Comparison methods of energy system frameworks, models and scenario results", Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 167, p. 112 719, 2022.

[5] R. Morrison, "Energy system modeling: Public transparency, scientific reproducibility, and open development", Energy Strategy Reviews, vol. 20, pp. 49–63, 2018.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-23

How to Cite

Peters, F. N., Muhammad, A., Engel, F., Schäfer, M., & Stappel, M. (2026). Harmonizing Energy System Scenario Data Through Ontological Annotation: A Case Study Within the NFDI4Energy Ecosystem. Open Conference Proceedings, 9. https://doi.org/10.52825/ocp.v9i.3310

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Proceedings to the 3rd NFDI4Energy Conference - Extended Abstratcs

Funding data