Performance and Cost Evaluation of a Structured Thermal Energy Storage Tank

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52825/solarpaces.v4i.2953

Keywords:

Aspect Ratio, Capacity Cost, Ceramic Material, Packed Bed Thermocline, Structured Thermocline, Thermal Energy Storage

Abstract

This study presents a numerical and economic evaluation of a novel structured thermal energy storage (TES) system using recycled ceramic structured material with internal flow channels. The performance of this system is compared with a conventional packed-bed configuration composed of natural rocks and sand. An unsteady one-dimensional numerical model is developed to simulate heat transfer and fluid flow, with varying design parameters such as the tank aspect ratio and the channel diameter in the structured configuration. All cases assume a fixed bed tank volume of 18,380m³. Results show that low aspect ratios enhance energy accumulation in structured configurations due to the larger tank diameter, which reduces the fluid velocity inside the channels and increases residence time, thereby improving heat transfer and thermocline thickness. Structured TES configurations with small channel diameters (typically 5 mm) further improve performance, even surpassing packed beds in some cases. However, low aspect ratios penalise economic performance, as the fixed-size buffer and sump regions occupy a larger fraction of the tank volume, increasing the capacity cost (in $/kWh). Packed beds benefit from higher aspect ratios, which improve thermal stratification and reduce capacity cost. The study concludes that ceramic structured TES can achieve competitive or superior capacity costs compared to packed beds when the geometry is properly optimised. Furthermore, structured systems offer the potential to mitigate issues such as thermal ratcheting. Future work will focus on optimising additional parameters such as the void fraction and the charging and discharging cutoff temperature, as well as on experimental validation and system-level cost integration.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] A. Gil et al., ‘State of the art on high temperature thermal energy storage for power generation. Part 1—Concepts, materials and modellization’, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 31–55, Jan. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2009.07.035. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.07.035

[2] A. Gautam and R. P. Saini, ‘A review on technical, applications and economic aspect of packed bed solar thermal energy storage system’, J. Energy Storage, vol. 27, p. 101046, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.est.2019.101046. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2019.101046

[3] T. Chekifi and M. Boukraa, ‘Thermocline storage for concentrated solar power plants: Descriptive review and critical analysis’, J. Energy Storage, vol. 55, p. 105773, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.est.2022.105773. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2022.105773

[4] J. E. Pacheco, S. K. Showalter, and W. J. Kolb, ‘Development of a Molten-Salt Thermocline Thermal Storage System for Parabolic Trough Plants’, J. Sol. Energy Eng., vol. 124, no. 2, pp. 153–159, Apr. 2002, doi: 10.1115/1.1464123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1464123

[5] M. Strasser and R. Selvam, ‘A cost and performance comparison of packed bed and structured thermocline thermal energy storage systems’, Sol. Energy, vol. 108, pp. 390–402, Oct. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2014.07.023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2014.07.023

[6] C. Odenthal, J. Tombrink, F. Klasing, and T. Bauer, ‘Comparative study of models for packed bed molten salt storage systems’, Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 226, p. 120245, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.120245

[7] A. Pizzolato, F. Donato, V. Verda, M. Santarelli, and A. Sciacovelli, ‘CSP plants with thermocline thermal energy storage and integrated steam generator – Techno-economic modeling and design optimization’, Energy, vol. 139, pp. 231–246, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.07.160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.07.160

[8] ‘Demonstration Development Project: Solar Thermocline Storage Systems: Preliminary Design Study’. Accessed: July 31, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.epri.com/research/products/1019581

[9] O. Sanmartí, J. Vera, S. Torras, and C. D. Pérez-Segarra, ‘Parametric study for a structured thermal energy storage system for concentrated solar power plants’, Energy, p. 132271, June 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.132271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.132271

[10] T. Esence, A. Bruch, S. Molina, B. Stutz, and J.-F. Fourmigué, ‘A review on experience feedback and numerical modeling of packed-bed thermal energy storage systems’, Sol. Energy, vol. 153, pp. 628–654, Sept. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2017.03.032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2017.03.032

Downloads

Published

2026-06-10

How to Cite

Sanmartí Perona, O., Vera, J., Torras, S., & Pérez-Segarra, C. D. (2026). Performance and Cost Evaluation of a Structured Thermal Energy Storage Tank. SolarPACES Conference Proceedings, 4. https://doi.org/10.52825/solarpaces.v4i.2953

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Thermal Energy Storage Materials, Media, and Systems
Received 2025-09-15
Accepted 2026-04-16
Published 2026-06-10