Reduced-Order-Model to Optimize the Thermo-Hydraulic Performance of a Cavity Receiver
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52825/solarpaces.v4i.3008Keywords:
Design Optimization, ROM, SVD, CFD, FEAAbstract
The overall performance of central receiver CSP plants highly depends on the design of the solar field and the receiver. The high computational cost of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), Finite Element Analysis (FEA) and raytracing simulations to evaluate the performance of these systems limits the feasibility of using such detailed simulations in coupled optimization schemes. As a result, coupled optimization approaches commonly use correlations and heuristic optimization methods instead of detailed, high-fidelity simulations for quick performance evaluations to enable an optimization loop and iteratively optimize the solar field and the receiver towards a coupled optimum. Although such correlations enable quick performance evaluations, they are often not very precise and only valid for a specific range of boundary conditions. Therefore, this study proposes the integration of Reduced-Order-Models (ROM) based on a limited set of high-fidelity training data points into the coupled optimization framework as an alternative to empirical correlations for receiver performance predictions. In this work, convective and radiative ROMs of a theoretical central tower cavity receiver have been successfully built, and a validation study showed very good estimation performance of 1,19% and 4,47% using the original data tensor consisting of 243 training data points. Theoretically reducing the training data set to 32 resulted in a noticeable increase of estimation error to 5,39% and 9,1%, but also a significant reduction in required training points. Once the ROM has been built, the performance evaluation of a single design point requires approximately tROM,i ≈ 0,06s, which is comparable to the time typically required using empirical correlations. Overall, the results demonstrate that data-driven ROMs provide a promising intermediate modeling approach between purely empirical correlations and fully resolved high-fidelity simulations.
Downloads
References
[1] C. K. Ho, "A review of high-temperature particle receivers for concentrating solar power", Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 109, pp. 958-969, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.04.103.
[2] E. Ghirardi, "Optimization of solar thermal power plants", PhD thesis, 2020. DOI: 10.13122/978-88-97413-60-8.
[3] F. Siala, and M. Elayeb, "Mathematical formulation of a graphical method for a no-blocking heliostat field layout", Renewable Energy, vol. 23, pp. 77-92, 2001. DOI: 10.1016/S0960-1481(00)00159-2.
[4] F. Collado, and J. Guallar, "Campo: Generation of regular heliostat fields", Renewable Energy, vol. 46, pp. 49-59, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2012.03.011.
[5] B. Kister, "A user’s Manual for DELSOL3: A computer code for calculating the optical performance and optimal system design for solar thermal central receiver plants", Sandia Report, vol. SAND86-8018, 1986. DOI: 10.2172/7228886.
[6] C. Noone, M. Torrilhon, and A. Mitos, "Heliostat field optimization: A new computationally efficient model and biomimetic layout", Solar Energy, vol. 86, pp. 792-803, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2011.12.007.
[7] E. Carrizosa, and C. Domínguez-Bravo, "A heuristic method for simultaneous tower and pattern-free optimization on solar power systems", Computers & Operations Research, vol. 57, pp. 109-122, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2014.11.017.
[8] P. Schwarzbözl, R. Pitz-Paal, and M. Schmitz, "Visual HFLCAL - A Software Tool for Layout and Optimisation of Heliostat Fields", SolarPACES Proceedings, 2009. DOI: oai:elib.dlr.de:60308.
[9] P. Falcone, "A handbook for solar central receiver design", Sandia Report, vol. SAND-86-8009, 1986. DOI: 10.2172/6545992.
[10] V. Grigoriev, M. Blanco, and K. Milidonis, "Tonatiuh++ Solar Raytracer", https://github.com/CST-Modelling-Tools/tonatiuhpp, 2022, Accessed: 25.02.2026.
[11] J. Martinek, and Z. Ma, "A Planar-Cavity Receiver Configuration for High-Temperature Solar Thermal Processes", National Renewable Energy Laboratory, vol. NREL/CP-5700-87566, no. 3, 2024.
[12] V. Casalegno, "High-Performance SiC–Based Solar Receivers for CSP: Component Manufacturing and Joining", Materials, vol. 14, pp. 478-488, 2021.
[13] M. Balat-Pichelin, "Emissivity at high temperature of Ni-based superalloys for the design of solar receivers for future tower power plants", Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 227, p. 8, 2021.
[14] S. Brunton, and J. Kutz, "Data-driven Science and Engineering", Cambridge University Press, vol. 2, pp. 4-5, 10-12, 2022. DOI: 10.1017/9781108380690.
[15] F. Römer, "Analytical performance evaluation for HOSVD-based parameter estimation schemes", IEEE International Workshop on Computational Advances in Multi-Sensor Adaptive Processing, vol. 3, pp. 2598-2601, 2009.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Tom Todtenhaupt, Manuel Silva Pérez, Jorge Galán Vioque, Juan Valverde García

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Accepted 2026-05-11
Published 2026-07-06
Funding data
-
HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Grant numbers 101072537