DLT as an Audit and Trust Layer for AI Decisions

A Practice-Based, Architecture- and Governance-Oriented Classification

Authors

  • Markus Begerow Independent Researcher

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52825/th-wildau-ensp.v3i.3516

Keywords:

Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT), AI Governance, Auditability of AI Systems, Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence, System Architecture, Decision Traceability, Institutional Trust, Compliance and Accountability

Abstract

In recent years, artificial intelligence has become a central component of digital transformation strategies and is increasingly influencing operational decision-making processes within organisations. Advances in machine learning have led to AI systems being increasingly integrated into operational decision-making processes. At the same time, however, it is becoming apparent that many AI systems are only able to manage the transition from pilot applications to audit-proof and accountable production environments to a limited extent.
In practice, AI decisions are often embedded within complex data and system landscapes that have evolved over time. Unclear responsibilities and a lack of traceability regarding data states, model versions and decision-making contexts hinder the trustworthy deployment of AI. These shortcomings relate less to the performance of the models than to the structural requirements for their governance.
This paper presents a practice-oriented architectural concept that addresses the need for sustainable trust in AI decisions by introducing an additional audit and trust layer. Against this backdrop, it demonstrates how distributed ledger technologies (DLT) can be utilised as an independent and immutable infrastructure for logging key AI artefacts. The aim is to present DLT as a complementary building block for governance, auditability and institutional accountability in AI system architectures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Gartner, “Gartner Predicts Over 40% of Agentic AI Projects Will Be Canceled by End of 2027”, Gartner Newsroom (Press Release), Jun. 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2025-06-25-gartner-predicts-over-40-percent-of-agentic-ai-projects-will-be-canceled-by-end-of-2027

[2] E. Halonen, “The Limits of Explainable AI: Why Explanations Fall Short of Accountability”,

The Algorithmic Society, Dec. 1, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.thealgorithmicsociety.com/p/the-limits-of-explainable-ai

[3] J. Mökander and L. Floridi, “Operationalising AI Governance Through Ethics-Based Audit-ing: An Industry Case Study”, arXiv:2407.06232, Jul. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.06232

[4] Bitkom e.V., “KI in Unternehmen - Charts”, Bitkom, Oct. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.bitkom.org/sites/main/files/2024-10/241016-bitkom-charts-ki.pdf

[5] M. Begerow, M. Goram, and B. Höcker, Data & Analytics für Einsteiger: Der praktische Leitfaden für Ausbildung, Studium und Beruf. Berlin, German, 2026.

[6] E. Papagiannidis, P. Mikalef, and K. Conboy, “Responsible Artificial Intelligence Govern-ance: A Review and Research Framework”, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst., vol. 34, no. 2, Art. no. 101885, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.jsis.2024.101885.

[7] N. Burkart, “Explainable AI - Grundlegende Konzepte und Anwendungen”, in Proc. 17th DSS, Karlsruhe, Germany, 2024, doi: 10.5162/17dss2024/1.1.

[8] Krypto-besteuern.de, Krypto und Steuern: Der Leitfaden zur Besteuerung von virtuellen Währungen. Berlin, German, 2024.

[9] Datenbanken verstehen - für Anfänger und Profis, “Data Governance”, Datenbanken-verstehen.de. [Online]. Available: https://www.datenbanken-verstehen.de/lexikon/data-governance/

[10] Deutsche Bundesbank, “Distributed-Ledger-Technologien in der Finanzindustrie”, Deut-sche Bundesbank, Frankfurt am Main, Germany, Sep. 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.bundesbank.de/resource/blob/665446/cfd6e8fbe0f2563b9fc1f48fabda8ca2/mL/2017-09-distributed-ledger-technologien-data.pdf

[11] Data & AI Campus, “Smart Contracts”, Data-AI-Campus.de. [Online]. Available: https://www.data-ai-campus.de/lexikon/smart-contracts/

[12] G. Fridgen, N. Guggenberger, T. Hoeren, W. Prinz, N. Urbach, et al., “Chancen und Her-ausforderungen von DLT (Blockchain) in Mobilität und Logistik”, Fraunhofer-Institut für An-gewandte Informationstechnik FIT, Tech. Rep., 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.fim-rc.de/Paperbibliothek/Veroeffentlicht/1106/wi-1106.pdf

[13] N. Urbach and F. Völter, “Grundlagen und Potenziale der Distributed Ledger Technology,” in Input Control - Datenqualität und Datenvalidität als Grundlage rechtlicher Automatisie-rungsprozesse, Abschnitt “Throughput”, LR 2020, pp. 119-129, May 12, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.fim-rc.de/Paperbibliothek/Veroeffentlicht/1135/wi-1135.pdf

[14] M. Evers-Wölk, J. Kluge, and S. Steiger, “Künstliche Intelligenz und Distributed-Ledger-Technologie in der öffentlichen Verwaltung: Ein Überblick von Chancen und Risiken ein-schließlich der Darstellung international einschlägiger Praxisbeispiele“, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://publikationen.bibliothek.kit.edu/1000151158/149392454

[15] L. Beckenbauer and T. Haverland, “Synergien von Blockchain und KI: Ein Modell digitaler Souveränität für Europa”, Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, Policy Study, 2023. [Online]. Availa-ble: https://www.kas.de/de/einzeltitel/-/content/synergien-von-blockchain-und-ki

[16] Markus Begerow, “Proof of Cognition: When AI Agents Take Over the Reins of Block-chain”, Blogbeitrag, 31. Aug. 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.markus-begerow.de/proof-of-cognition-when-ai-agents-take-over-the-reins-of-blockchain/

Published

2026-08-18

How to Cite

Begerow, M. (2026). DLT as an Audit and Trust Layer for AI Decisions: A Practice-Based, Architecture- and Governance-Oriented Classification. TH Wildau Engineering and Natural Sciences Proceedings , 3. https://doi.org/10.52825/th-wildau-ensp.v3i.3516

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Contributions to the Wildau Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2026