Ensuring That Dual-Use Means Multi-Value: A Framework for the Co-Prioritization of Cattle Grazing and PV Energy Generation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52825/agripv.v3i.1374

Keywords:

Agrivoltaics, Agri Solar Grazing, Renewable Energy

Abstract

Photovoltaics (PV) is the fastest growing portion of the energy sector and the lowest-cost form of renewable energy today. PV development will continue to accelerate as the world strives to meet climate goals and reduce dependence on fossil fuels. The need for open, sun-abundant landscapes puts the solar (PV) industry in competition for land with agriculture and threatens intact native rangeland, stimulating valid concerns about negative impacts to ecological processes and function, such as soil stability, nutrient cycling, water cycling, and biodiversity. The co-location of PV energy generation and agriculture, commonly referred to as agrivoltaics, and specifically livestock grazing, offers a win-win scenario. While sheep grazing is being broadly employed, there is increasing interest in cattle grazing on PV projects. Our research seeks to understand if we can co-optimize cattle grazing and PV energy generation by designing and managing Solar Savannas, where ecological processes, capture of solar energy, and animal health and agricultural performance are equally prioritized. This is not only a question of dual-use but of multi-value. For agrivoltaics to be a meaningful sustainability solution, we hypothesize that dual-use must provide multiple values, including ecosystem service provision, agricultural production, and PV energy generation, bolstering community relationships and social and economic viability. We are engaged in ongoing research to ensure and measure this multi-value system, building ecological, agricultural, and financial models. What we learn from the modeling of this multi-value approach to eco-agri-energy systems is intended to eliminate tradeoffs of either-or systems, reduce barriers to dual-use systems, and finally, promote holistic solutions for the integration of multi-value systems. The purpose of this paper is to present a novel foundational framework, the Solar Savanna, and establish a theoretical basis for research and agrivoltaics practices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

IREA, "Rewable Power Generation Costs in 2021," International Renewable Energy Agency, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2022/Jul/IRENA_Power_Generation_Costs_2021.pdf?rev=34c22a4b244d434da0accde7de7c73d8

T. F. Guerin, "Impacts and opportunities from large-scale solar photovoltaic (PV) electricity generation on agricultural production," Environmental Quality Management, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 7-14, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/tqem.21629?casa_token=JQXmksZOV1YAAAAA%3AqqJwuV7w2fkTlNbkcOM8CdoaV3SsJK_-kiRLmv8BtBBJ2Z3GXfqZHeH8HVg7xeUk5rRwbZhiHO7oZq4.

N. Gomez-Casanovas et al., "Knowns, uncertainties, and challenges in agrivoltaics to sustainably intensify energy and food production," Cell Reports Physical Science, vol. 4, no. 8, p. 101518, 2023/08/16/ 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrp.2023.101518.

J. E. Macknick, "Co-Location of Agriculture and Solar: Opportunities to Improve Energy, Food, and Water Resources," National Renewable Energy Lab.(NREL), Golden, CO (United States), 2019. Accessed: January 5, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy19osti/73696.pdf

M. A. Sturchio et al., "Grassland productivity responds unexpectedly to dynamic light and soil water environments induced by photovoltaic arrays," Ecosphere, vol. 13, no. 12, p. e4334, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4334.

G. A. Barron-Gafford et al., "Agrivoltaics provide mutual benefits across the food–energy–water nexus in drylands," Nature Sustainability, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 848-855, 2019, doi: https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1567040.

W. J. Parton, M. Hartman, D. Ojima, and D. Schimel, "DAYCENT and its land surface submodel: description and testing," Global and Planetary Change, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 35-48, 1998/12/01/ 1998, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8181(98)00040-X.

S. J. Del Grosso and W. J. Parton, "History of Ecosystem Model Development at Colorado State University and Current Efforts to Address Contemporary Ecological Issues," in Bridging Among Disciplines by Synthesizing Soil and Plant Processes, 2019, pp. 53-69.

B. J. Heins, K. T. Sharpe, E. S. Buchanan, and M. H. Reese, "Agrivoltaics to shade cows in a pasture-based dairy system," AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 2635, no. 1, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0103148.

E. W. Kampherbeek et al., "A preliminary investigation of the effect of solar panels and rotation frequency on the grazing behavior of sheep (Ovis aries) grazing dormant pasture," Applied Animal Behaviour Science, vol. 258, p. 105799, 2023/01/01/ 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2022.105799.

G. C. Daily, "Introduction: what are ecosystem services," Nature’s services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems, vol. 1, no. 1, 1997. [Online]. Available: https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/37236591/Daily_1-libre.pdf?1428437954=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DNatures_services_societal_dependence_on.pdf&Expires=1709936079&Signature=BiPliMXALqLQmQr7iQLD4oDyHcdIe-Ula3PMrJJTyNjwdITZUovVS~LK1-zRJa6~19ik2sW3Cp1qOWlB7NTqtvTY5JDH7ta38IUxqkica7VDHTRgpCgQZhIDt2cQ-qLcZkaSmlr~XNRrdFvxDfFprAobBKbf~o8UDk48lxE~hTSXdxMplhYIcHN-kcQ7DyS2rgn7mFDLmonzHo2EmOvNePJMKYb17nHyvelCFd7WhrEkJXTdVRU2yp4OD5MDmUbBGf4GXJ-94Me5G6Us3gbCS5EuFVkiOX~2gOX9hWD5iMgbA5ORZDrDrPf2NHnKnfMwQR5WxfnS5QfTnK-x8RAMEw__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA.

A. C. Monlezun, K. W. Jones, R. Rhoades, and S. J. Lynn, "Seeking common ground: A pluralistic valuation of rangeland ecosystem services," Rangelands, vol. 46, no. 3, 2024/04/30/ 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rala.2024.03.003.

U. Pascual et al., "Valuing nature’s contributions to people: the IPBES approach," Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, vol. 26, pp. 7-16, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.006.

S. Carpinelli, A. F. da Fonseca, P. H. Weirich Neto, S. H. B. Dias, and L. d. S. Pontes, "Spatial and temporal distribution of cattle dung and nutrient cycling in integrated crop–livestock systems," Agronomy, vol. 10, no. 5, p. 672, 2020.

C. Zhao et al., "Transfer of nitrogen and phosphorus from cattle manure to soil and oats under simulative cattle manure deposition," Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 13, p. 916610, 2022.

L. N. Edwards-Callaway et al., "Impacts of shade on cattle well-being in the beef supply chain," Journal of Animal Science, vol. 99, no. 2, p. skaa375, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaa375.

A. S. Pascaris, C. Schelly, M. Rouleau, and J. M. Pearce, "Do agrivoltaics improve public support for solar? A survey on perceptions, preferences, and priorities," Green Technology, Resilience, and Sustainability, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 8, 2022/10/23 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44173-022-00007-x.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-26

How to Cite

de Vries, N., & Monlezun, A. C. (2025). Ensuring That Dual-Use Means Multi-Value: A Framework for the Co-Prioritization of Cattle Grazing and PV Energy Generation. AgriVoltaics Conference Proceedings, 3. https://doi.org/10.52825/agripv.v3i.1374

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Grazing and Animal Welfare
Received 2024-06-14
Accepted 2025-02-14
Published 2025-05-26

Funding data