Parabolic Trough Collectors for Existing District Heating Networks
A Simulation Comparison in TRNSYS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52825/isec.v2i.3374Keywords:
Parabolic Trough Collectors, Solar District Heating, SDH, TRNSYS, Validation, Simulation, Renewable Heat Systems, Concentrating Solar Thermal, CST, Solar Heat For Industrial Processes, SHIP, ProSolNetzAbstract
Parabolic trough collectors are a suitable renewable heat technology for supplying temperatures above 100 °C and can therefore contribute to the decarbonization of district heating (DH) systems as well as industrial process heat applications [1]. To support the reliable integration of such technologies into system design and planning, validated simulation tools are required. In this work, the performance of a parabolic trough collector field is analysed by comparing TRNSYS simulation results with measurement data from a real plant in Limassol, Cyprus [2].
The comparison is based on high resolution operational and weather data as well as two representative days with different irradiation conditions. The comparison shows that TRNSYS is able to reproduce the characteristic behavior of the collector loop, including supply temperatures and the thermal output. Deviations between simulation and measurements can be explained to identifiable factors such as uncertainties in the cleanliness factor, limited information about soiling, the operational mode of the plant, and tracking errors at the plant.
Despite these uncertainties, the level of correspondence is sufficient for validation purposes. Additional measurement data, particularly on mass flow of the heat transfer fluid (HTF), tracking signals, and cleaning cycles, would further improve the model accuracy and allow for a more detailed validation in future work.
Downloads
References
[1] IEA SHC Task 68 RA1 (2024), Solar Collector Technologies for District Heating, report RA1, doi.org/ 10.18777/ieashc-task68-2024-0002.
[2] TRNSYS (2026), TRNSYS-Transient System Simulation Tool, available from: www.trnsys.com/.
[3] IEA SHC Task 68 RA2 (2025), Simulation and Calculation Tools for Solar District Heating, report RA2, doi.org/10.18777/ieashc-task68-2025-0001.
[4] Panayiotis K. Ktistis, Rafaela A. Agathokleous, Soteris A. Kalogirou, Experimental per-formance of a parabolic trough collector system for an industrial process heat application, Energy, Volume 215, Part A, 2021, 119288, ISSN 0360-5442, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119288.
[5] Fraunhofer ISE. (2026). “Messdaten_bereinigt_FileNameDateFormerGMT+2_resampled1min.csv” [Data set], ProSolNetz.
[6] Stefan Abrecht, Solar-Experience, Preliminary Results PTC Limassol, (11.2025).
[7] Christoph Hilgert, Christian Jung, Kai Schickedanz, Guillaume Saliou, Anne Schlierbach, Marc Röger, Loreto Valenzuela, Erich Schaffer, Christoph Wasserfuhr, Operation of HEL-ISOL®5A in a parabolic trough test loop, Solar Energy, Volume 290, 2025, 113301, ISSN 0038-092X, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2025.113301.
[8] SCFW (ScenoCalc Fernwärme) (2026), Ertragsvorhersagetool für Solarthermie-Anlagen in Wärmenetzen, available from: http://www.scfw.de/.
[9] BSW Solar (Bundesverband Solarwirtschaft e.V.), Prozess- und Fernwärme mit konzent-rierenden Solarkollektoren [accessed on 14.7.2025], available from: www.solarwirtschaft.de/unsere-themen/csp/prosolnetz/.
Published
How to Cite
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Silas Tamm, Magdalena Berberich, Dirk Krüger

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Funding data
-
Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie
Grant numbers 03EN603F