Annual Yield Simulation of Solar Parks With SubMPPT

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52825/pv-symposium.v2i.2646

Keywords:

Annual Energy Yield Simulation, SubMPPT, Space Utilization Rate, Pvlib

Abstract

Solar power generation plays a crucial role in the energy transition, especially in countries like Germany where the area for photovoltaic power plants is limited. This study uses simulations to show how Substring Maximum Power Point Tracking technology improves the space utilization rate of photovoltaic power plants compared to conventional String Maximum Power Point Tracking and bypass diodes. The simulation uses the Python library Pvlib and a single-diode model to calculate the current-voltage characteristics of each substring within the solar modules. When the spacing between module rows decreases, the number of modules per area increases, but so does partial shading. In conventional systems, this shading leads to higher energy losses. Substring Maximum Power Point Tracking actively reduces these losses by regulating each substring individually. Substring Maximum Power Point Tracking reduces these losses, resulting in a  +10.03 % increase in space utilization rate and a  +22.22 % increase in annual energy yield compared to String Maximum Power Point Tracking when the row spacing is minimized. With larger row spacing and less shading, the advantage of Substring Maximum Power Point Tracking is lower, even leading to a  −2.76 % decrease in space utilization rate. The simulations confirm that selecting the optimal row spacing is essential for maximizing economic efficiency. Future research will include an economic assessment of different solar park designs using Substring Maximum Power Point Tracking.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

S. Eckerter, K. Kerekes, P. Mader und R. Merz, „Analysis of Irradiation Differences on Substringlevel in Solar Parks,“ 41th EUPVSEC, 2024.

I. Mehedi, Z. Salam, M. Ramli, V. Chin, H. Bassi, M. Rawa und M. Abdullah, „Critical evaluation and review of partial shading mitigation methods for grid-connected PV system using hardware solutions: The module-level and array-level approaches,“ Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Bd. 146, pp. 111-138, 2021.

C. Allenspach, F. Carigiet, A. Bänziger, A. Schneider und F. Baumgartner, „Power Conditioner Efficiencies and Annual Performance Analyses with Partially Shaded Photovoltaic Generators Using Indoor Measurements and Shading Simulations,“ RRL Solar, 2023.

S. Enkhardt, „pv-magazin.de,“ pv magazin, 30 06 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.pv-magazine.de/2022/10/19/projekt-solarpark-2-0-mehr-photovoltaik-leistung-auf-der-gleichen-flaeche/. [Zugriff am 19 10 2022].

R. Brace, A. Neumann, T. Czarnecki und R. Merz, „Substring-MPPT for 4-Terminal 3-Substring Modules,“ in EU PVSEC 2018, 2018.

R. Merz, S. Eckerter, S. Coenen und P. Mader, „Substring-MPPT steigert Strangleistung bei Teilverschattung,“ In Tagungsunterlagen 39. PV-Symposium , 2024.

P. Mader, S. Eckerter und R. Merz, „DESIGN OF THE SUBSTRING MPP TRACKER,“ 41th EUPVSEC, 2024.

K. Anderson, C. Hansen, W. Holmgren, A. Jensen, M. Mikofski und A. Driesse, „pvlib python: 2023 project update,“ Journal of Open Source Software, Bd. 8(92), Nr. 5994, 2023.

G. Lakkas, „MOSFET power losses and how they affect power-supply efficiency,“ Analog Applications Journal, pp. 22-26, 2016.

Rohm Semiconductor, „Efficiency of Buck Converter,“ ROHM Co., Ltd., 2022.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-21

How to Cite

Eckerter, S., Mader, P., Coenen, S., & Merz, R. (2025). Annual Yield Simulation of Solar Parks With SubMPPT. PV-Symposium Proceedings, 2. https://doi.org/10.52825/pv-symposium.v2i.2646

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Conference papers
Received 2025-03-14
Accepted 2025-11-12
Published 2025-11-21

Funding data