Simulating platooned connected autonomous vehicle in a large scale urban scenario




CAVs, Connected Autonomous Vehicles, micro-simulation, large-scale urban


This article is concerned with the performance evaluation of connected, autonomous vehicles (CAVs) in a realistic large-scale microsimulation scenario. In particular the question is: how much could a high diffusion of CAVs possibly change (1)~the average travel speeds (2)~the trip times of all traffic participants, including pedestrians, and (3)~the energy/fuel consumption? For this purpose, admittedly favourable assumptions are made: a 100\% diffusion of platooning-capable CAVs as substitution for private cars as well as a high maximum speed of platooned vehiclesin order to enable platoon formation. The morning rush hour scenario of the metropolitan area of Bologna, Italy has been selected for assessment. This scenario, which has been created and validated in previous works, represents an activity based demand model with travel plans for individual citizens, including all relevant transport modes.  The microsimulation is performed by means of the SUMO simulator. The entire demand has been generated with the SUMOPy tool. For the platooning of CAVs, SUMO's SIMPLA module has been used, which controlls the vehicles via the interactive TRACI API.

Results show an increased speed and reduced travel time for CAV vehicles, with respect to human driven cars, in particular in the periphery and less in the center with a dense road network.  However, the reason for improved speeds and travel times is predominantly the higher maximum speed  allowed for vehicles trying to catch up and join a platoon. Furthermore these higher speed would also be resposible for an increase in fuel consumption of approximately 5\%.

In conclusion, CAVs alone are unlikely to reduce congestion in an urban area. To make the platooning concept work, additional technology and infrastructure is required in order to merge platoons effectively at freeways and at traffic lights. The latter could be simulated with GLOSA.


Download data is not yet available.


M. Behrisch, L. Bieker, J. Erdmann, and D. Krajzewicz. Sumo - simulation of urban mobility. In SIMUL 2011, The Third International Conference on Advances in System Simulation.

R. Horowitz and P. Varaiya. Control design of automated highway system. IEEE Proc., 88(7), July 2000. DOI:

Seungjae Lee, Benjamin Heydecker, Jooyoung Kim, and Sangung Park. Stability analysis on a dynamical model of route choice in a connected vehicle environment. Transportation Research Procedia, 23:720–737, 12 2017. DOI:

P. Li, L. Alvarez, and R. Horowitz. AHS safe control laws for platoon leaders. IEEE Trans. Contr. Syst. Technol., 5(6):615–628, November 1997. DOI:

Qiong Lu, Tamas Tettamanti, Dniel Hrcher, and Istvn Varga. The impact of autonomous vehicles on urban traffic network capacity: an experimental analysis by microscopic traffic simulation. Transportation Letters The International Journal of Transportation Research, 12, 09 2019. DOI:

Margarita Martnez-Daz and Francesc Soriguera. Autonomous vehicles: theoretical and practical challenges. Transportation Research Procedia, 33:275–282, 2018. XIII Conference on Transport Engineering, CIT2018. DOI:

J. Schweizer. Non-linear feedback control for short time headways based on constant-safety vehicle-spacing. In IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, pages 167 – 172, S.N. – ITA, Giugno 2004. s.n.

J. Schweizer. Sumopy wiki, 2016.

Joerg Schweizer, Cristian Poliziani, Federico Rupi, Davide Morgano, and Mattia Magi. Building a large-scale micro-simulation transport scenario using big data. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 10:165, 03 2021. DOI:

Joerg Schweizer, Federico Rupi, Francesco Filippi, and Cristian Poliziani. Generating activity based, multi-modal travel demand for sumo. In Evamarie Wiessner, Leonhard Lücken, Robert

Hilbrich, Yun-Pang Flötteröd, Jakob Erdmann, Laura Bieker-Walz, and Michael Behrisch, editors, SUMO 2018- Simulating Autonomous and Intermodal Transport Systems, volume 2 of EPiC Series in Engineering, pages 118–133. EasyChair, 2018.

Steven Shladover, Dongyan Su, and Xiao-Yun Lu. Impacts of cooperative adaptive cruise control on freeway traffic flow impacts of cooperative adaptive cruise control on freeway traffic flow. Volume 2324, 01 2012. DOI:

J.T. Spooner and K.M. Passino. Fault tolerant control for automated highway systems. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 46(3):771–785, August 1997. DOI:

M. Szillat. PRT system simulation. In 7th Int. Conf. on Automated People Movers’99, pages 31–33, IDA House, Kalvabod Brygge 31-33,DK-1780 Copenhagen V, May 1999. IDA.

Sumo user. Sumo wiki, 2016. lased visited 28.02.2022.

Roger Woodman, Ke Lu, Matthew Higgins, Simon Brewerton, Paul Jennings, and Stewart Birrell. Gap acceptance study of pedestrians crossing between platooning autonomous vehicles in a virtual environment. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 67:1–14, 11 2019. DOI:




How to Cite

Schweizer, J., Poliziani, C., & Rupi, F. . (2022). Simulating platooned connected autonomous vehicle in a large scale urban scenario. SUMO Conference Proceedings, 3, 171–179.

Conference Proceedings Volume


Conference papers