The Development of Pedestrian Gap Acceptance and Midblock Pedestrian Road Crossing Behavior Utilizing SUMO

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52825/scp.v2i.90

Abstract

While there are several published studies for modelling pedestrian behavior at signalized crossings in SUMO, the behavior of pedestrians crossing a road at a location other than a designated crossing, has not been considered to date. This work looks at how to represent pedestrian agents selecting to cross a road at arbitrary locations along the length of the road. The pedestrian agents utilize a gap acceptance model that represents how a pedestrian decides when to cross a road, based on the frequency and speed of approaching vehicles, while considering the spacing between them. Furthermore, the gap acceptance model allows the pedestrians to choose to cross all lanes in one go, when safe to do so, known as Double Gap or one stage crossing. Alternatively, if an agent is identified as a risk-taker, they may choose to cross lane by lane, sometimes waiting in the middle of the road, known as Rolling Gap or risk-taker crossing behavior. The inclusion of these two crossing behaviors allows for situations where urgency plays an important role in behavioral decision making, such as in emergencies, rush hour or in crowd management events. The outlined pedestrian crossing model is attained by integrating the pedestrian model EXODUS with SUMO, via the TraCI API.

References

Akyol, G., Silgu, M.A., Celikoglu, H.B, (2019). Pedestrian-Friendly Traffic Signal Control Using Esclipse in SUMO, SUMO User Conference 2019, May 13-15 Berlin-Adlershof, Germany, May 2019, V.62 PP 101-106, https://doi.org/10.29007/c6k6.

Balakrishnan, N, (1992) Handbook of the Logistic Distribution, December 3, CRC Press, SBN 9780367450458.

Brewer, M. Fitzpatrick, K., Whitacre, J., Lord, D, (2006). Exploration of Pedestrian Gap-Acceptance Behavior at Selected Locations”, Transportation Research Record, 1982(1), 132–140. doi:10.3141/1982-18.

Brosseau M., Zangenehpour S., Saunier N., Miranda-Moreno L., (2013). The impact of waiting time and other factors on dangerous pedestrian crossings and violations at signalized intersections: A case study in Montreal Transp. Res. F, 21, pp. 159-172.

Chooramun, N., Lawrence, P. , Galea E., (Aug, 2017), Evacuation simulation using Hybrid Space Discretisation and Application to Large Underground Rail Tunnel Station”, Physical Sciences Reviews, Vol. 2, Issue 7, DOI:10.1515/psr-2017-0001.

Erdmann, J., Krajzewicz, D. (2015). Modelling pedestrian dynamics in SUMO, SUMO User Conference 2015, DLR, Berlin - Adlershof, Germany, 7-8 May 2019, V.28, pp103-118, ISSN 1866-721X.

Flötteröd, Y., Behrisch, M., Hendriks, M., Bonne, J., Vullings E., Bruining, R. Co-simulation of vehicles and crowds for rescue trials, , SUMO User Conference 2019, May 13-15 Berlin-Adlershof, Germany, May 2019, V.62 PP 56-69, https://doi.org/10.29007/qzg2

FSEG (2021) EXODUS Capabilities, Retrieved from: https://fseg.gre.ac.uk/exodus/ exodus_products.html, [Accessed: 14 May 2021].

Han, L.D., Yuan, F. (2005, November) Evacuation modeling and operations using dynamic traffic assignment and most desirable destination approaches”, in Proceedings of the 84th Annual Meeting Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, USA.

Hine, J., (1996). Assessing the impact of traffic on behaviour and perceptions of safety using an in-depth interview technique, Journal of Transport Geography, 4(3), 179–197, 1996

Galea,E.R., Lawrence, P.J., Fillippidis L., Blackshields, D., Cooney, D., (2012). buildingEXODUS V 6.1 Theory Manual, Fire Safety Engineering Group, University of Greenwich, 2012.

Galea, E, Owen, M, Lawrence, P, (July, 1996). The EXODUS Model, Fire Engineers Journal, pp.26-30.

Grandison, A., (2020). Determining Confidence Intervals, and Convergence, for Parameters in Stochastic Evacuation Models, Fire Technology 56(6), DOI: 10.1007/s10694-020-00968-0.

Kadali, B. R., & Vedagiri, P. (2013). Modelling pedestrian road crossing behaviour under mixed traffic condition. European Transport - Trasporti Europei, (55), 1–17.

Islam, M. S., Serhiyenko, V., Ivan, J. N., Ravishanker, N., & Garder, P. E. (2014). Explaining pedestrian safety experience at urban and suburban street crossings considering observed conflicts and pedestrian counts. Journal of Transportation Safety & Security, 6, 335–355.

Lämmel, G., Klüpfel, H., Nagel, K., (2009). The MATSim Network Flow Model for Traffic Simulation Adapted to Large-Scale Emergency Egress and an Application to the Evacuation of the Indonesian City of Padang in Case of a Tsunami Warning, Chapter 11, pages 245-265, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, DOI:10.1108/9781848557512-011.

Lawrence, P.J., Pellacini, V., Galea, E.R. (March 2020). The Modelling of Pedestrian Vehicle Interaction for Post-Exiting Behaviour, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics (PED2018), Lund, Sweden, 21-23 August , 2018, Pages 271-279, Published March 2020, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17815/CD.2020.60.

LEGION, (2017). Pedestrian and Traffic Simulation Integrated into a Single Software Application [Online], Available: http://www.legion.com/pedestrian-traffic-simulation-integrated-into-a-single-software-application, [Accessed: 3 Jan 2018].

Lopez, P.A., Behrisch M., Bieker-Walz, L., Erdmann, J., Flötteröd, Y-P., Hilbrich, R., Lücken, L., Rummel, J. Wagner, P., Wiessner, E. (2018) Microscopic Traffic Simulation using SUMO, In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Maui, HI, USA, 4-7 Nov. 2018, DOI: 10.1109/ITSC.2018.8569938.

Liu, Y., Shi, J. and Xiong, H. (2002) The simulation technology in traffic systems (in Chinese). Beijing: China Communications Press.

Paul, M. Rajbonshi, P., (November 2014). A Comprehensive Review on Pedestrian Gap Acceptance at Unsignalized Road, International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), Vol. 3, Issue 11, November-2014, ISSN: 2278-0181.

Pawar, D. S., & Patil, G. R. (2014). Pedestrian temporal and spatial gap acceptance at mid-block street crossing in developing world. Journal of Safety Research, 52, 39–46. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2014.12.006.

Serag.M.S. (2014). Modelling pedestrian road crossing at uncontrolled mid-block locations in developing countries. International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering, 4(3), 274–285

Schroeder, B. J. (2008). A Behavior-Based Methodology for Evaluating Pedestrian-Vehicle Interaction at Crosswalks. Analysis, 332.

Song L., D. M. C. and B. J., (1993). Models of delay and accident risk to pedestrians. Transportation and Traffic Theory/ C.F. Daganzo (Editor), 295-312.

Song, L., Dunne, M.C., Black, J.A. (2003). Models of Delay and Accident Risk to Pedestrians, Transportation and Traffic Theory”, Proceedings of the Twelfth International Symposium, Elsevier Science.

SUMO, (2021). Randomness [Online], Available: https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Simulation/ Randomness.html, [Accessed: 5 July 2021].

Sun, D., Ukkusuri, S., Benekohal, R., Waller, S.(2002, November). Modeling of motorist-pedestrian interaction at uncontrolled mid-block crosswalks, Proceedings of 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation, Research Board, Urbana.

Wang, T. (2012). Study of Pedestrian - Vehicle Interaction Behaviour by Microscopic Simulation Modelling, Doctoral Thesis, University of Southampton, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment.

Wegener, A., Piórkowski, M., Raya, M.. Hellbrück, H., Fischer, S., Hubaux, J. P. (2008) TraCI: An interface for coupling road traffic and network simulators, Proceedings of the 11th Communications and Networking Simulation Symposium CNS '08, pp. 155-163.

Xin X., Jia N., Zheng L., Ma S. (2014). Power-law in pedestrian crossing flow under the interference of vehicles at an un-signalized midblock crosswalk Physica A, 406, pp. 287-297, 10.1016/j.physa.2014.03.068

Yannis, G., & Technical, N. (2010). Pedestrian gap acceptance for mid-block street crossing. 12th World Conference for Transportation Research, 1–11

York, I., Ball, S. D., Beesley, R., Webster, D., & Hopkin, J., (2011). Pedestrian Countdown at Traffic Signal Junctions (PCaTS) - Road trial - (TfL 2481). http://content.tfl.gov.uk/PCaTS-Note-3-PCaTS-Trial-Results-Report.pdf

Zhang, C., Zhou, B., Chen, G., & Chen, F. (2017). Quantitative analysis of pedestrian safety at uncontrolled multi-lane mid-block crosswalks in China. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 108, 19–26.

Zhao, J., Malenje, J., Wu, J., Ma, R,. (2020) Modeling the interaction between vehicle yielding and pedestrian crossing behavior at unsignalized midblock crosswalks, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour Volume 73, August 2020, Pages 222-235.

Zheng, Y., Chase, Y., Elefteriadou, L, Schroeder, B., Sisiopoku, V.P. (2015). Modeling vehicle–pedestrian interactions outside of crosswalks, Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, Volume 59, December 2015, Pages 89-101.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-29

How to Cite

Lawrence, P., Pellacini, V., Blackshields, D., & Filippidis , L. (2022). The Development of Pedestrian Gap Acceptance and Midblock Pedestrian Road Crossing Behavior Utilizing SUMO. SUMO Conference Proceedings, 2, 33–51. https://doi.org/10.52825/scp.v2i.90

Issue

Section

Conference papers

Funding data