Techno-Economic Optimization of Falling Particle Receivers for Solar Tower Plants
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52825/solarpaces.v3i.2306Keywords:
Particle Receiver, Solar Tower, Concentrated Solar Power, Techno-Economic AnalysisAbstract
Solid particle receivers are proposed as the next generation of receivers for solar tower CSP plants as they are able to overcome the temperature limits of solar salts. However, maximizing their performance requires robust design optimization tools. Therefore, this study proposes a methodology for the techno-economic optimization of the design of falling particle receivers for polar-field solar tower CSP plants. Given a specific solar field and location, the optimized design is derived using a parametric approach based on Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) minimization, varying the height and the width of the receiver, as well as, the size of thermal energy storage. Methodology is applied to a 100 MWth solar tower plant in Daggett, California, and the results show that the receiver sized using the proposed approach can achieve LCOE of 80.1 $/MWh that is by 2.2 % lower compared to the LCOE of the receiver sized only through on-design performance maximization.
Downloads
References
M. Mehos et al., “Concentrating Solar Power Gen3 Demonstration Roadmap,” NREL/TP--5500-67464, 1338899, Jan. 2017. doi: 10.2172/1338899.
G. Gentile, G. Picotti, F. Casella, M. Binotti, M. E. Cholette, and G. Manzolini, “SolarReceiver2D: a Modelica Package for Dynamic Thermal Modelling of Central Receiver Systems,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 55, no. 20, pp. 259–264, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.09.105.
G. Gentile, G. Picotti, M. Binotti, M. E. Cholette, and G. Manzolini, “Dynamic thermal analysis and creep-fatigue lifetime assessment of solar tower external receivers,” Solar Energy, vol. 247, pp. 408–431, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2022.10.010.
F. Crespi, G. Gavagnin, D. Sánchez, and G. S. Martínez, “Supercritical carbon dioxide cycles for power generation: A review,” Applied Energy, vol. 195, pp. 152–183, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.02.048.
M. J. Wagner and T. Wendelin, “SolarPILOT: A power tower solar field layout and characterization tool,” Solar Energy, vol. 171, pp. 185–196, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2018.06.063.
O. Pasqualotto, F. Sobic, G. Gentile, M. Binotti, A. Giostri, and G. Manzolini, “A falling particle receiver thermal model for system-level analysis of solar tower plants,” Solar Energy, vol. 268, p. 112117, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2023.112117.
L. F. González-Portillo, K. Albrecht, and C. K. Ho, “Techno-Economic Optimization of CSP Plants with Free-Falling Particle Receivers,” Entropy, vol. 23, no. 1, p. 76, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.3390/e23010076.
D. Alfani, M. Astolfi, M. Binotti, P. Silva, and E. Macchi, “Off-design performance of CSP plant based on supercritical CO2 cycles,” presented at the SOLARPACES 2019: International Conference on Concentrating Solar Power and Chemical Energy Systems, Daegu, South Korea, 2020, p. 130001. doi: 10.1063/5.0029801.
R. Span and W. Wagner, “A New Equation of State for Carbon Dioxide Covering the Fluid Region from the Triple-Point Temperature to 1100 K at Pressures up to 800 MPa,” Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1509–1596, Nov. 1996, doi: 10.1063/1.555991.
R. Buck and S. Giuliano, “Impact of solar tower design parameters on sCO2-based solar tower plants,” 2018, DuEPublico: Duisburg-Essen Publications Online, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany. doi: 10.17185/DUEPUBLICO/46098.
G. Kolb, “An evaluation of possible next-generation high temperature molten-salt power towers.,” SAND2011-9320, 1035342, Dec. 2011. doi: 10.2172/1035342.
F. Rinaldi, M. Binotti, A. Giostri, and G. Manzolini, “Comparison of Linear and Point Focus Collectors in Solar Power Plants,” Energy Procedia, vol. 49, pp. 1491–1500, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.03.158.
P. Falcone, “A handbook for solar central receiver design,” SAND-86-8009, 6545992, ON: DE87009985, Dec. 1986. doi: 10.2172/6545992.
G. Agsburger, “Thermo-economic optimisation of large solar tower power plants,” Jan. 2013, doi: 10.5075/EPFL-THESIS-5648.
C. K. Ho et al., “Performance Evaluation of a High-Temperature Falling Particle Receiver,” in Volume 1: Biofuels, Hydrogen, Syngas, and Alternate Fuels; CHP and Hybrid Power and Energy Systems; Concentrating Solar Power; Energy Storage; Environmental, Economic, and Policy Considerations of Advanced Energy Systems; Geothermal, Ocean, and Emerging Energy Technologies; Photovoltaics; Posters; Solar Chemistry; Sustainable Building Energy Systems; Sustainable Infrastructure and Transportation; Thermodynamic Analysis of Energy Systems; Wind Energy Systems and Technologies, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Jun. 2016, p. V001T04A006. doi: 10.1115/ES2016-59238.
A. Calderón et al., “Review of solid particle materials for heat transfer fluid and thermal energy storage in solar thermal power plants,” Energy Storage, vol. 1, no. 4, p. e63, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1002/est2.63.
N. P. Siegel, M. D. Gross, and R. Coury, “The Development of Direct Absorption and Storage Media for Falling Particle Solar Central Receivers,” Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, vol. 137, no. 4, p. 041003, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.1115/1.4030069.
R. C. Knott, D. L. Sadowski, S. M. Jeter, S. I. Abdel-Khalik, H. A. Al-Ansary, and A. El-Leathy, “High Temperature Durability of Solid Particles for Use in Particle Heating Concentrator Solar Power Systems,” in Volume 1: Combined Energy Cycles, CHP, CCHP, and Smart Grids; Concentrating Solar Power, Solar Thermochemistry and Thermal Energy Storage; Geothermal, Ocean, and Emerging Energy Technologies; Hydrogen Energy Technologies; Low/Zero Emission Power Plants and Carbon Sequestration; Photovoltaics; Wind Energy Systems and Technologies, Boston, Massachusetts, USA: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Jun. 2014, p. V001T02A041. doi: 10.1115/ES2014-6586.
N. T. Weiland, B. W. Lance, and S. R. Pidaparti, “sCO2 Power Cycle Component Cost Correlations From DOE Data Spanning Multiple Scales and Applications,” in Volume 9: Oil and Gas Applications; Supercritical CO2 Power Cycles; Wind Energy, Phoenix, Arizona, USA: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Jun. 2019, p. V009T38A008. doi: 10.1115/GT2019-90493.
University of Adelaide et al., “Gen 3 Particle Pilot Plant (G3P3) -- High-Temperature Particle System for Concentrating Solar Power (Phases 1 and 2),” SAND2021-14614, 1832285, 701739, Nov. 2021. doi: 10.2172/1832285.
N. Blair et al., “System Advisor Model (SAM) General Description (Version 2017.9.5),” Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory, NREL/TP-6A20-70414. [Online]. Available: https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy18osti/70414.pdf
M. Mehos, C. Turchi, J. Jorgenson, P. Denholm, C. Ho, and K. Armijo, “On the Path to SunShot: Advancing Concentrating Solar Power Technology, Performance, and Dispatchability,” Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory, NREL/TP-5500-65688, 2016. [Online]. Available: http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy16osti/65688.pdf.
Published
How to Cite
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Filip Sobic, Giancarlo Gentile, Marco Binotti, Andrea Giostri, Giampaolo Manzolini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Accepted 2025-06-10
Published 2025-08-27