Selection of Glass Alternative Materials for Manufacturing Heliostat Reflective Facets

An Analytical Approach

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52825/solarpaces.v3i.2307

Keywords:

Concentrating Solar Power, Sandwich Panels, Heliostat Facets, Material Selection, Novel Reflectors

Abstract

Traditional concentrating solar power plants utilize silvered glass reflective facets that account for a significant portion of the total plant cost. Several cost-effective non-glass reflectors have been developed. A majority of these novel reflectors are flexible, which necessitates exploring support structures to maintain their shape during use. This study presents a methodology for evaluating and selecting structural support materials for non-glass heliostat facets. The approach employs analytical models to efficiently screen a large pool of candidate materials based on strength, stiffness, and deflection due to gravity, using an existing glass reflector panel as a reference. During analysis, sandwich panels showed promise as viable support for the reflector. The most promising sandwich panel designs are further investigated using experimental testing. The analytical model predictions are found to align moderately well with physical test results, validating its utility for rapid material selection. The top-performing sandwich panel designs demonstrate the potential for cost savings and increased facet size compared to traditional glass facets. This research provides a framework for evaluating and selecting structural materials for non-glass heliostat facets, enabling improved cost-effectiveness and performance of concentrating solar power systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] W. Bank, Concentrating solar power clean power on demand 24/7, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://pubdocs.worldbank.org/en/849341611761898393/WorldBank- CSPReport-Concentrating-Solar-Power-Clean-Power-on-Demand-24-7-FINAL.pdf.

[2] G. J. Kolb, C. K. Ho, T. R. Mancini, and J. A. Gary, Sandia report power tower technology roadmap and cost reduction plan, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1011644.

[3] J. Yellowhair and C. E. Andraka, “Evaluation of advanced heliostat reflective facets on cost and performance,” Energy Procedia, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.03.029.

[4] J. Coventry, J. Campbell, and C. J. Hall, Heliostat cost down scoping study-final report ocean wave power view project vortex tube view project, 2013. [Online]. Available: https: //www.researchgate.net/publication/312214094.

[5] SunDog Solar, Everbright. [Online]. Available: https://www.sundogsolartech.com.

[6] Alanod, Alanod miro-sun. [Online]. Available: https://alanod.com/en/industries/solar/reflective-surfaces.

[7] P. Kurup, S. Akar, C. Augustine, and D. Feldman, Initial heliostat supply chain analysis, 2022. [Online]. Available: www.nrel.gov/publications..

[8] R. Budynas and J. Nisbett, Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design. McGraw-Hill Education, 2015, ISBN: 9789814595285.

[9] ANSYS Inc., Granta edupack, 2023. [Online]. Available: www.ansys.com/materials.

[10] STERG, Helio100 promises cost-effective solar power breakthrough, Aug. 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.sun.ac.za/english/archive/Lists/English_News_Archive_110518/DispForm.aspx?ID=2863&ContentTypeId=0x010019F8BC5373DFA740B008FC720EA25DE601008842D5DFBB60F541BF61E7750F3D6BA5.

[11] P. Sivalingam, K. Vijayan, S. Mouleeswaran, and V. Vellingiri, “On the tensile and compressive behavior of a sandwich panel made of flax fiber and agglomerated cork,” Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 2022. DOI: 10.1177/14644207211043227.

[12] R. J. Roark, W. C. Young, and R. G. Budynas, Roark’s formulas for stress and strain. McGraw-Hill, 2002, pp. 435–439, ISBN: 007072542X.

[13] Microsoft Corporation, Microsoft excel, version 2019 (16.0), Sep. 24, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://office.microsoft.com/excel.

[14] American Society of Civil Engineers, ASCE 7 - 22. Jul. 2022, ISBN: 0784415781.

[15] AMT Composites, Ampreg 30 slow. [Online]. Available: https://www.amtcomposites.co.za/product/ampreg-30-slow-6-3kg/.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-10

How to Cite

Schnaar-Campbell, J., McGregor, C., & Bredell, J. (2025). Selection of Glass Alternative Materials for Manufacturing Heliostat Reflective Facets: An Analytical Approach. SolarPACES Conference Proceedings, 3. https://doi.org/10.52825/solarpaces.v3i.2307

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Advanced Materials, Manufacturing, and Components
Received 2024-09-09
Accepted 2025-04-29
Published 2025-10-10