Optimal Design of Hybrid Solar Power Systems: A Case Study in the Chinese Market
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52825/solarpaces.v3i.2313Keywords:
Concentrated Solar Power (CSP), Photovoltaic (PV), Hybrid Solar Power, Ultimate Trough, Molten Salt, Techno-Economic OptimizationAbstract
The global energy industry is shifting towards a net-zero energy system to achieve climate neutrality, leading to significant growth in distributed renewable energy generation. This reshapes market dynamics and presents challenges in balancing supply and demand, increasing the risk of midday oversupply and variability in renewable generation, potentially compromising grid reliability. Concentrated solar power (CSP) offers a viable solution for grid decarbonization by integrating large-scale renewables and providing ancillary services like peak shaving and load shifting, frequency control, and energy storage, complementing the intermittent supply of photovoltaics (PV). The synergy between low-cost PV and dispatchable CSP fosters a resilient and sustainable system. Demonstration projects, especially in China, emphasize the relevance of hybrid CSP systems. CSP plants are built alongside large-scale PV installations to address the growing challenges associated with the electrical grid. The study explores hybridizing high-performance collectors, specifically Ultimate Trough (UT) collectors using molten salt as a heat transfer fluid, with PV to identify optimal solar field sizing and operational strategies. The techno-economic optimization framework integrates in-house cost models with thermodynamic and optical models derived from the System Advisor Model (SAM). A case study in Shichengzi, China, evaluates a hybrid CSP + PV plant with integrated thermal storage. High-performance collectors and better synergy in UT and PV production profiles lead to a 17% and 35% reduction in the power purchase agreement (PPA) price compared to conventional large aperture troughs not optimized for molten salt operation and linear Fresnel devices. This research supports informed decision-making and design solutions for sustainable and economically viable renewable energy production.
Downloads
References
[1] “IEA, Solar Energy Perspectives,” IEA, Paris, 2011. Accessed: Jul. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.iea.org/reports/solar-energy-perspectives
[2] C. Wu, X.-P. Zhang, and M. Sterling, “Solar power generation intermittency and aggre-gation,” Scientific Reports, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 1363, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05247-2.
[3] L. Giordano, G. Furlan, G. Puglisi, and F. A. Cancellara, “Optimal design of a renewable energy-driven polygeneration system: An application in the dairy industry,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 405, p. 136933, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136933.
[4] D. M. Grueneich, “The Next Level of Energy Efficiency: The Five Challenges Ahead,” The Electricity Journal, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 44–56, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2015.07.001.
[5] “U.S. Energy Information Administration, Today in Energy,” U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2024. Accessed: Jul. 17, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.iea.org/reports/renewable-energy-market-update-june-2023
[6] “IEA, Renewable Energy Market Update,” IEA, Paris, 2023. Accessed: Jul. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.iea.org/reports/renewable-energy-market-update-june-2023
[7] K.-J. Riffelmann, G. Weinrebe, and M. Balz, “Hybrid CSP-PV plants with integrated thermal storage,” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 2445, no. 1, p. 030020, May 2022, doi: 10.1063/5.0086610.
[8] H. Ye et al., “A demonstration concentrating solar power plant in China: Carbon neutrali-ty, energy renewability and policy perspectives,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 328, p. 117003, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117003.
[9] G. Furlan and F. You, “Robust design of hybrid solar power systems: Sustainable inte-gration of concentrated solar power and photovoltaic technologies,” Advances in Applied Energy, vol. 13, p. 100164, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adapen.2024.100164.
[10] L. Pilotti, M. Colombari, A. F. Castelli, M. Binotti, A. Giaconia, and E. Martelli, “Simulta-neous design and operational optimization of hybrid CSP-PV plants,” Applied Energy, vol. 331, p. 120369, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120369.
[11] “Blue Book of China’s Concentrating Solar Power Industry 2023,” China Solar Thermal Alliance (CSTA), Beijing, 2024.
[12] M. Welisch, “The market environment for CSP projects in Europe (D6.1). MUSTEC project,” Wien, 2019.
[13] “IEA, Renewables 2022,” Paris, 2022. Accessed: Jul. 17, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.iea.org/reports/renewables-2022
[14] “IEA, Technology Roadmap - Concentrating Solar Power,” Paris, 2010. Accessed: Jul. 17, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.iea.org/reports/technology-roadmap-concentrating-solar-power
[15] K.-J. Riffelmann, A. Schweitzer, G. Weinrebe, and M. Balz, “Planning and building the first ultimate trough collector field in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia,” AIP Conference Pro-ceedings, vol. 2126, no. 1, p. 040002, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1063/1.5117582.
[16] R. Storn and K. Price, “Differential Evolution – A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for glob-al Optimization over Continuous Spaces,” Journal of Global Optimization, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 341–359, Dec. 1997, doi: 10.1023/A:1008202821328.
Published
How to Cite
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Gabriele Furlan, Axel Schweitzer, Fabian Gross, Alf Oschatz

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Accepted 2025-06-13
Published 2025-11-25