Numerical Investigation of Novel Parabolic Trough Receiver Configurations Using Liquid Sodium as Heat Transfer Fluid
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52825/solarpaces.v3i.2347Keywords:
Parabolic Trough Collector, Turbulator Inserts, Heat Transfer Enhancement, CFDAbstract
This paper conducts a numerical investigation of the performance improvement of a Parabolic Trough Collector (PTC) receiver using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations performed in ANSYS Fluent. The study aims to evaluate novel receiver configurations by comparing a conventional receiver (Case 1) with three innovative configurations (Cases 2, 3, and 4), using liquid sodium as the heat transfer fluid (HTF). The model’s accuracy is validated against experimental data and theoretical expressions from the literature. Simulations are performed across various mass flow rates to assess key parameters, including the Nusselt number, friction coefficient, thermal efficiency, and circumferential temperature difference. The results indicate that Case 3 demonstrates the highest thermal performance among the configurations. Specifically, the novel receiver configurations consistently outperformed the conventional receiver. The Nusselt number increased by 29.84%, 126.1%, and 10%; the friction factor rose by 178%, 305%, and 17%; the thermal efficiency improved by 3.6%, 4%, and 3.4%; and the temperature difference decreased by 4.05%, 13.2%, and 1.31% for Confs 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Additionally, liquid sodium significantly enhanced the thermal performance of the PTC due to its superior thermal properties. These findings underscore the effectiveness of the proposed receiver configurations and the advantages of using liquid sodium as the HTF, offering a promising approach to improving PTC efficiency.
Downloads
References
[1] E. Bellos, C. Tzivanidis, D. Tsimpoukis, Enhancing the performance of parabolic trough collectors using nanofluids and turbulators, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 91 (2018) 358–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.091.
[2] A. Bilal Awan, M.N. Khan, M. Zubair, E. Bellos, Commercial parabolic trough CSP plants: Research trends and technological advancements, Sol. Energy. 211 (2020) 1422–1458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.09.072.
[3] A.M. Alaidaros, A.A. AlZahrani, Thermal performance of parabolic trough integrated with thermal energy storage using carbon dioxide, molten salt, and oil, J. Energy Storage. 78 (2024) 110084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.110084.
[4] Z.S. Kareem, M.N. Mohd Jaafar, T.M. Lazim, S. Abdullah, A.F. Abdulwahid, Passive heat transfer enhancement review in corrugation, Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 68 (2015) 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2015.04.012.
[5] J. Byiringiro, M. Chaanaoui, M. Halimi, S. Vaudreuil, Heat transfer improvement using additive manufacturing technologies: a review, Arch. Mater. Sci. Eng. 123 (2023) 30–41. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0053.9781.
[6] B. Zou, Y. Jiang, Y. Yao, H. Yang, Thermal performance improvement using unilateral spiral ribbed absorber tube for parabolic trough solar collector, Sol. Energy. 183 (2019) 371–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.03.048.
[7] O. Chakraborty, S. Roy, B. Das, R. Gupta, Effects of helical absorber tube on the energy and exergy analysis of parabolic solar trough collector – A computational analysis, Sustain. Energy Technol. Assessments. 44 (2021) 101083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101083.
[8] X. Zhu, L. Zhu, J. Zhao, Wavy-tape insert designed for managing highly concentrated solar energy on absorber tube of parabolic trough receiver, Energy. 141 (2017) 1146–1155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.10.010.
[9] İ.H. Yılmaz, A. Mwesigye, T.T. Göksu, Enhancing the overall thermal performance of a large aperture parabolic trough solar collector using wire coil inserts, Sustain. Energy Technol. Assessments. 39 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2020.100696.
[10] B. Kurşun, Thermal performance assessment of internal longitudinal fins with sinusoidal lateral surfaces in parabolic trough receiver tubes, Renew. Energy. 140 (2019) 816–827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.03.106.
[11] M.V. Bozorg, M. Hossein Doranehgard, K. Hong, Q. Xiong, CFD study of heat transfer and fluid flow in a parabolic trough solar receiver with internal annular porous structure and synthetic oil–Al2O3 nanofluid, Renew. Energy. 145 (2020) 2598–2614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.08.042.
[12] A. Kasaeian, S. Daviran, R.D. Azarian, A. Rashidi, Performance evaluation and nanofluid using capability study of a solar parabolic trough collector, Energy Convers. Manag. 89 (2015) 368–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.09.056.
[13] A. Hosseini esfahani, M. Aliehyaei, A.H. Joshaghani, M.M. Najafizadeh, Energy, exergy, economic and environmental analysis of parabolic trough collector containing hybrid nanofluid equipped with turbulator, Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 150 (2023) 492–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2023.02.031.
[14] N.V.V. Krishna Chaitanya, K. Ravi Kumar, Assessment of liquid metals as heat transfer fluid for parabolic trough solar collector, ISES Sol. World Congr. 2017 - IEA SHC Int. Conf. Sol. Heat. Cool. Build. Ind. 2017, Proc. (2017) 97–108. https://doi.org/10.18086/swc.2017.04.06.
[15] D. Kumar, K. Ravi, S.C. Kaushik, Heat transfer analysis of receiver for large aperture parabolic trough solar collector, (2019) 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.4554.
[16] A. Mwesigye, İ.H. Yılmaz, Thermal and thermodynamic benchmarking of liquid heat transfer fluids in a high concentration ratio parabolic trough solar collector system, J. Mol. Liq. 319 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.114151.
[17] Byiringiro, J., Chaanaoui, M., & Hammouti, B. (2025). Enhancement of thermal performance in parabolic trough solar Collectors: Investigation of three novel receiver configurations using advanced heat transfer fluids. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 293, 113833.
[18] K. Arshad Ahmed, E. Natarajan, Thermal performance enhancement in a parabolic trough receiver tube with internal toroidal rings: A numerical investigation, Appl. Therm. Eng. 162 (2019) 114224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114224.
[19] J. Liu, Y. He, X. Lei, Heat-transfer characteristics of liquid sodium in a solar receiver tube with a nonuniform heat flux, Energies. 12 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/en12081432.
[20] Ammar SM, Park CW. Validation of the Gnielinski correlation for evaluation of heat transfer coefficient of enhanced tubes by non-linear regression model: An experimental study of absorption refrigeration system. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 2020;118:104819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2020.104819.
[21] Petukhov BS. Heat Transfer and Friction in Turbulent Pipe Flow with Variable Physical Properties. Adv Heat Transf 1970;6:503–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2717(08)70153-9.
[22] E. Dudley, J. Kolb, A. Mahoney, T. Mancini, S. M, D. Kearney, Test results: SEGS LS-2 solar collector. Sandia National Laboratory. Report: SAND94- 1884, (1994) 140.
[23] J. Byiringiro, M. Chaanaoui, M. Halimi, Heat transfer enhancement of a parabolic trough solar collector using innovative receiver configurations combined with a hybrid nanofluid : CFD analysis, Renew. Energy. 233 (2024) 121169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2024.121169.
Published
How to Cite
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Meriem Chaanaoui, Justin Byiringiro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Accepted 2025-12-05
Published 2026-01-30