Decarbonizing Industrial Heat – A Comparison of Embodied Carbon for PV and Enclosed Parabolic Trough Systems

Authors

  • Markus Balz Glass Point Technology Center
  • Verena Göcke Glass Point Technology Center
  • Gerhard Weinrebe Glass Point Technology Center https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3260-5536

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52825/solarpaces.v3i.2371

Keywords:

Embodied Carbon, CST, PV, Enclosed Trough

Abstract

Heat accounts for more than half the world’s energy use. The largest user of heat is industry, and the pressure to decarbonize is high. Tendencies to “electrify everything” are seen everywhere, but electric energy is expensive for medium and high-temperature heat generation compared to burning natural gas. Moreover, electric grids are on average still characterized by significant greenhouse gas emissions per kilowatt-hour. But how about PV behind-the-meter, being cost-efficient and well-established in generating electricity? Is PV also the solution for the provision of industrial process heat? To answer this, we investigate the specific embodied carbon for heat production, comparing a PV system with GlassPoint’s enclosed trough concentrated solar thermal system (CST). We exemplarily analyze the case of an industrial process heat consumer in a sunny region to show the difference in embodied carbon, land use, and also give some cost indications. Our results show that this is not the case: Compared to enclosed parabolic trough collectors, PV is characterized by significantly higher embodied carbon values and needs about three times the land and corresponding structures to generate a given amount of heat.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] International Energy Agency (IEA), “Renewables 2020,” IEA, Paris, France, 2020. Accessed: Apr. 24, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.iea.org/reports/renewables-2020

[2] B. Mirletz et al., “2023 Annual Technology Baseline (ATB) Cost and Performance Data for Electricity Generation Technologies.” National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Jun. 09, 2023. doi: 10.25984/1987306.

[3] “Live 24/7 CO₂ emissions of electricity consumption.” Accessed: Sep. 04, 2024. [Online]. Available: http://electricitymap.tmrow.co

[4] S. Kraemer, “World’s First Utility-Scale Molten Salt Fresnel CSP Plant Connects to China’s Grid,” SolarPACES. Accessed: Apr. 10, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.solarpaces.org/worlds-first-utility-scale-molten-salt-fresnel-csp-plant-connects-to-chinas-grid/

[5] C. Murray, “Brenmiller inaugurates ‘world-first’ thermal energy storage gigafactory,” Energy-Storage.News. Accessed: Jul. 19, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.energy-storage.news/brenmiller-inaugurates-world-first-thermal-energy-storage-gigafactory/

[6] “Home - System Advisor Model - SAM.” Accessed: Jun. 28, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://sam.nrel.gov/

[7] B. Smith, A. Sekar, H. Mirletz, G. Heath, and R. Margolis, “An Updated Life Cycle Assessment of Utility-Scale Solar Photovoltaic Systems Installed in the United States,” NREL/TP--7A40-87372, 2331420, MainId:88147, Mar. 2024. doi: 10.2172/2331420.

[8] “2018 - Emission Factors for Greenhouse Gas Inventories.pdf.” Accessed: Jul. 31, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2020-04/documents/ghg-emission-factors-hub.pdf

Downloads

Published

2025-11-25

How to Cite

Balz, M., Göcke, V., & Weinrebe, G. (2025). Decarbonizing Industrial Heat – A Comparison of Embodied Carbon for PV and Enclosed Parabolic Trough Systems . SolarPACES Conference Proceedings, 3. https://doi.org/10.52825/solarpaces.v3i.2371

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Solar Industrial Process Heat and Thermal Desalination
Received 2024-09-06
Accepted 2025-05-07
Published 2025-11-25