Continuous Solar Hydrogen and Syngas Production in Membrane Reactors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52825/solarpaces.v3i.2405Keywords:
Solar Hydrogen, Membrane Reactor, Thermal Simulation, Ray-TracingAbstract
Satisfying the industry's growing demand for sustainable hydrogen requires the rapid development of a diverse mix of hydrogen production technologies. The membrane technology is capable of shifting the thermodynamic limits of water splitting to lower temperatures and thus into a technically feasible range. This thermodynamic limit was determined with respect to possible molar flow parameters and temperature, where biomethane is considered as reducing agent on the permeate side of the membrane or a purge gas dilutes the permeated oxygen concentration. In the second part of this study, a developed thermal model is used to analyse the integration of real solar flux distribution into a membrane stack reactor. To avoid failure of the joined membrane modules, a homogeneous temperature distribution (< 50K) along the reactor body is required. However, the solar flux distribution from a solar system is characterised by a Gaussian-shape with a peak in its centre, which results in the generation of hot spots. Our model consists of a cavity, the reactor and a set of plates, which are used to enhance the temperature distribution in the reactor. It was found that parameters such as the aperture diameter of the cavity, the distance of the cavity to the focal point and the material of the irradiated plates influence the temperature distribution on the reactor stack. An aperture diameter of 55 mm and a distance of 135 mm to the focal point met the temperature requirements of the membrane stack reactor.
Downloads
References
[1] Kai Bittner, Nikolaos Margaritis, Falk Schulze-Küppers, Jörg Wolters, and Ghaleb Natour. 2023. A mathematical model for initial design iterations and feasibility studies of oxygen membrane reactors by minimizing Gibbs free energy. Journal of Membrane Science 685, 121955. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2023.121955.
[2] Brendan Bulfin. 2019. Thermodynamic limits of countercurrent reactor systems, with examples in membrane reactors and the ceria redox cycle. Physical Chemistry Chemi-cal Physics 21, 4, 2186–2195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cp07077f.
[3] A. M. Clausing. 1983. Convective Losses From Cavity Solar Receivers - Comparisons Between Analytical Predictions and Experimental Results. Journal of Solar Energy En-gineering1 105, 29–33.
[4] DLR e.V. - Institute of Solar Research, Ed. 2007. Der neue Hochleistungsstrahler des DLR - Grundlagen, Technik, Anwendung. DLR e.V. - Institute of Solar Research.
[5] David G. Goodwin, Harry K. Moffat, Ingmar Schoegl, Raymond L. Speth, and Bryan W. Weber. 2023. Cantera: An Object-oriented Software Toolkit for Chemical Kinetics, Thermodynamics, and Transport Processes. Zenodo.
[6] J. M. Jones, P. E. Mason, and A. Williams. 2019. A compilation of data on the radiant emissivity of some materials at high temperatures. Journal of the Energy Institute 92, 3, 523–534. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2018.04.006.
[7] Yasuki Kadohiro, Vamshi K. Thanda, Bruno Lachmann, Kai Risthaus, Nathalie Mon-nerie, Martin Roeb, and Christian Sattler. 2023. Cavity-shaped direct solar steam gen-erator employing conical helical tube for high-temperature application: Model develop-ment, experimental testing and numerical analysis. Energy Conversion and Manage-ment: X 18, 100366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2023.100366.
[8] Robert P. Minneci, Eric A. Lass, Jeffrey R. Bunn, Hahn Choo, and Claudia J. Rawn. 2021. Copper-based alloys for structural high-heat-flux applications: a review of devel-opment, properties, and performance of Cu-rich Cu–Cr–Nb alloys. International Materi-als Reviews 66, 6, 394–425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09506608.2020.1821485.
[9] Somtochukwu G. Nnabuife, Eni Oko, Boyu Kuang, Abdulrauf Bello, Azikiwe P. Onwua-lu, Sherry Oyagha, and James Whidborne. 2023. The prospects of hydrogen in achiev-ing net zero emissions by 2050: A critical review. Sustainable Chemistry for Climate Ac-tion 2, 100024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scca.2023.100024.
[10] Md M. Rahman, Abayomi O. Oni, Eskinder Gemechu, and Amit Kumar. 2020. As-sessment of energy storage technologies: A review. Energy Conversion and Manage-ment 223, 113295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113295.
[11] Nigel M. Sammes, Alevtina Smirnova, and Oleksandr Vasylyev. 2005. Fuel cell tech-nologies: State and perspectives. NATO science series, 202. Springer, Dordrecht.
[12] Lance L. Snead, Takashi Nozawa, Yutai Katoh, Thak-Sang Byun, Sosuke Kondo, and David A. Petti. 2007. Handbook of SiC properties for fuel performance modeling. Jour-nal of Nuclear Materials 371, 1-3, 329–377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.05.016.
Published
How to Cite
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nicole Neumann, Juan Pablo Rincon Duarte, Martin Roeb

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Accepted 2025-06-23
Published 2025-12-12
Funding data
-
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Grant numbers 03SF0648A