AI-Based Generative Geometrical Design of Concentrated Solar Thermal Tower Receivers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52825/solarpaces.v3i.2406Keywords:
Concentrated Solar Power, Concentrated Solar Thermal, Thermal Receivers, Generative Design, Artificial Intelligence, NSGA-IIIAbstract
An artificial intelligence (AI) aided generative design workflow for the optimization of cavity receivers for concentrated solar thermal (CST) energy systems is presented. The workflow integrates the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm III (NSGA-III) with generative design methodologies and optical evaluation through Monte-Carlo ray-tracing in an interoperable way, to optically optimize the geometry of cavity receivers according to a set of objective functions for a given heliostat field. As a demonstrator test case, the workflow is used to provide an optimal geometrical design of a cavity receiver given the Cyprus Institute’s PROTEAS heliostat field. It is shown that the workflow is able to generate unconventional, non-intuitive and efficient receiver designs in an automated manner, which are often not conceived by traditional design approaches.
Downloads
References
[1] S. Kr, J. Bilalovic, A. Jha, N. Patel and H. Zhang, “Renewable energy: Present research and future scope of Artificial Intelligence,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 77, pp. 297-317, 2017.
[2] K. Milidonis, M. J. Blanco, V. Grigoriev, C. F. Panagiotou, A. M. Bonanos, M. Constantinou, J. Pye and C.-A. Asselineau, “Review of application of AI techniques to Solar Tower Systems,” Solar Energy, vol. 224, pp. 500-515, 2021.
[3] M. A. Al-Sulaiman and A. Fahad, “Optimization of heliostat field layout in solar central receiver systems on annual basis using differential evolution algorithm,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 95, pp. 1-9, 2015.
[4] T. Ashley, E. Carrizosa and E. Fernández-Cara, “Heliostat field cleaning scheduling for Solar Power Tower plants: A heuristic approach,” Applied Energy, vol. 235, pp. 653-660, 2019.
[5] Y. Luo, T. Lu and X. Du, “Novel optimization design strategy for solar power tower plants,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 177, pp. 682-692, 2018.
[6] V. Grigoriev, M. Blanco and K. Milidonis, “Tonatiuh++ Solar Raytracer (v0.1.8.17),” Zenodo, 2022.
[7] A. M. Bonanos and C. N. Papanicolas, “The PROTEAS facility heliostat field: Layout and performance prediction,” in 5th International Conference on Renewable Energy Sources & En-ergy Efficiency, Nicosia, Cyprus, 2016.
[8] J. Ballestrín and A. Marzo, “Solar radiation attenuation in solar tower plants,” Solar Energy, vol. 86, pp. 388-392, 2012.
[9] H. Akima, “A New Method of Interpolation and Smooth Curve Fitting Based on Local Procedures,” J. ACM, vol. 17, pp. 589-602, 1970.
[10] N. Siinivas and K. Deb, “Muiltiobj ective Optimization Using Nondominated Sorting in Genetic Algorithms,” 1994.
[11] K. Deb and H. Jain, “An evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm using reference-point-based nondominated sorting approach, Part I: Solving problems with box constraints,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 18, pp. 577-601, 2014.
[12] I. Das and J. E. Dennis, “Normal-Boundary Intersection: A New Method for Generating the Pareto Surface in Nonlinear Multicriteria Optimization Problems,” SIAM Journal on Optimization, vol. 8, pp. 631-657, 1998.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jorge Moreno García-Moreno, Kypros Milidonis, Mihalis Nicolau, Wojciech Lipinksi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Accepted 2025-04-08
Published 2025-11-25
Funding data
-
HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions
Grant numbers 101072537