AI-Based Generative Geometrical Design of Concentrated Solar Thermal Tower Receivers

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52825/solarpaces.v3i.2406

Keywords:

Concentrated Solar Power, Concentrated Solar Thermal, Thermal Receivers, Generative Design, Artificial Intelligence, NSGA-III

Abstract

An artificial intelligence (AI) aided generative design workflow for the optimization of cavity receivers for concentrated solar thermal (CST) energy systems is presented. The workflow integrates the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm III (NSGA-III) with generative design methodologies and optical evaluation through Monte-Carlo ray-tracing in an interoperable way, to optically optimize the geometry of cavity receivers according to a set of objective functions for a given heliostat field. As a demonstrator test case, the workflow is used to provide an optimal geometrical design of a cavity receiver given the Cyprus Institute’s PROTEAS heliostat field. It is shown that the workflow is able to generate unconventional, non-intuitive and efficient receiver designs in an automated manner, which are often not conceived by traditional design approaches.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] S. Kr, J. Bilalovic, A. Jha, N. Patel and H. Zhang, “Renewable energy: Present research and future scope of Artificial Intelligence,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 77, pp. 297-317, 2017.

[2] K. Milidonis, M. J. Blanco, V. Grigoriev, C. F. Panagiotou, A. M. Bonanos, M. Constantinou, J. Pye and C.-A. Asselineau, “Review of application of AI techniques to Solar Tower Systems,” Solar Energy, vol. 224, pp. 500-515, 2021.

[3] M. A. Al-Sulaiman and A. Fahad, “Optimization of heliostat field layout in solar central receiver systems on annual basis using differential evolution algorithm,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 95, pp. 1-9, 2015.

[4] T. Ashley, E. Carrizosa and E. Fernández-Cara, “Heliostat field cleaning scheduling for Solar Power Tower plants: A heuristic approach,” Applied Energy, vol. 235, pp. 653-660, 2019.

[5] Y. Luo, T. Lu and X. Du, “Novel optimization design strategy for solar power tower plants,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 177, pp. 682-692, 2018.

[6] V. Grigoriev, M. Blanco and K. Milidonis, “Tonatiuh++ Solar Raytracer (v0.1.8.17),” Zenodo, 2022.

[7] A. M. Bonanos and C. N. Papanicolas, “The PROTEAS facility heliostat field: Layout and performance prediction,” in 5th International Conference on Renewable Energy Sources & En-ergy Efficiency, Nicosia, Cyprus, 2016.

[8] J. Ballestrín and A. Marzo, “Solar radiation attenuation in solar tower plants,” Solar Energy, vol. 86, pp. 388-392, 2012.

[9] H. Akima, “A New Method of Interpolation and Smooth Curve Fitting Based on Local Procedures,” J. ACM, vol. 17, pp. 589-602, 1970.

[10] N. Siinivas and K. Deb, “Muiltiobj ective Optimization Using Nondominated Sorting in Genetic Algorithms,” 1994.

[11] K. Deb and H. Jain, “An evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm using reference-point-based nondominated sorting approach, Part I: Solving problems with box constraints,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 18, pp. 577-601, 2014.

[12] I. Das and J. E. Dennis, “Normal-Boundary Intersection: A New Method for Generating the Pareto Surface in Nonlinear Multicriteria Optimization Problems,” SIAM Journal on Optimization, vol. 8, pp. 631-657, 1998.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-25

How to Cite

Moreno García-Moreno, J., Milidonis, K., Nicolau, M., & Lipinksi, W. (2025). AI-Based Generative Geometrical Design of Concentrated Solar Thermal Tower Receivers. SolarPACES Conference Proceedings, 3. https://doi.org/10.52825/solarpaces.v3i.2406
Received 2024-09-09
Accepted 2025-04-08
Published 2025-11-25

Funding data