A New Reflected Target Optical Assessment System

Stage 1 Development Results

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52825/solarpaces.v1i.618

Keywords:

Heliostat Optics, Measurement, Slope, Canting, Deflectometry, Photogrammetry, Computer Vision, Concentrating Solar Power

Abstract

NREL has completed stage 1 development of an indoor optical measurement tool for fully assembled heliostats and single facets. This tool began as an indoor version of NREL’s outdoor Non-Intrusive Optical (NIO) measurement technique [1]. It uses similar techniques to other available tools (deflectometry, photogrammetry, etc.), but is designed to require very little infrastructure, labor, and time to set up and collect surface slope and canting measurements, making it a valuable tool for quality assurance and laboratory measurement of heliostat optics. It accomplishes this by using computer vision, photogrammetry, and multiple images stitched together to minimize the printed target size and required setup precision. This adaptable setup is useful for taking measurements at a variety of heliostat pointing angles, and for measuring fully assembled heliostats on the assembly line. In this paper, we describe the methodology behind the measurement system, present an initial analysis of its uncertainty and sensitivity, and compare it with established optical measurement systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

R. A. Mitchell and G. Zhu, “A non-intrusive optical (NIO) approach to characterize heliostats in utility-scale power tower plants: Sensitivity study,” Solar Energy, vol. 207, pp. 450–457, Sep. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.06.093.

C. A. Arancibia-Bulnes, M. I. Peña-Cruz, A. Mutuberría, R. Díaz-Uribe, and M. Sánchez-González, “A survey of methods for the evaluation of reflective solar concentrator optics,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 69, pp. 673–684, Mar. 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.048.

Pottler, Klaus, Lupfert, Eckhard, Johnston, Glen H. G., and Shortis, Mark R., “Photogrammetry: A Powerful Tool for Geometric Analysis of Solar Concentrators and Their Components,” J. Sol. Energy Eng., vol. 127, Feb. 2005.

J. Fernández-Reche and L. Valenzuela, “Geometrical Assessment of Solar Concentrators using Close-range Photogrammetry,” Energy Procedia, vol. 30, pp. 84–90, 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2012.11.011.

C. Andraka, “SOFAST: Sandia Optical Fringe Analysis Slope Tool for Mirror Characterization,” p. 10, Dec. 2018.

S. Ulmer, B. Brix, H. Koch, and A. Kämpgen, “QDec-M-Line: A Geometric Quality Control System to Assess Fully Assembled Parabolic Trough Modules in Series Production,” p. 8, 2020.

C. E. Andraka, S. Sadlon, B. Myer, K. Trapeznikov, and C. Liebner, “Rapid Reflective Facet Characterization Using Fringe Reflection Techniques,” Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, vol. 136, no. 1, p. 011002, Feb. 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4024250.

T. März, C. Prahl, S. Ulmer, S. Wilbert, and C. Weber, “Validation of Two Optical Measurement Methods for the Qualification of the Shape Accuracy of Mirror Panels for Concentrating Solar Systems,” Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, vol. 133, no. 3, p. 031022, Aug. 2011, doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4004240.

S. Schedler et al., “From research to industry: Development of a high-resolution measurement system for mirrored heliostats in series production,” presented at the SOLARPACES 2018: International Conference on Concentrating Solar Power and Chemical Energy Systems, Casablanca, Morocco, 2019, p. 030051. doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5117563.

N. S. Finch and C. E. Andraka, “Uncertainty Analysis and Characterization of the SOFAST Mirror Facet Characterization System,” J. Sol. Energy Eng., vol. 136, no. 1, p. 011003, Jul. 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4024251.

C. Andraka et al., “Sandia capabilities for the measurement, characterization, and analysis of heliostats for CSP.,” SAND2013-5492, 1090214, Jul. 2013. doi: https://doi.org/10.2172/1090214.

J. Beltrán-Madrigal and R. Díaz-Uribe, “Progress in the design of chromatic null screens to test cylindrical parabolic concentrators,” in 22nd Congress of the International Commission for Optics: Light for the Development of the World, R. Rodríguez-Vera, R. Díaz-Uribe, R. Rodríguez-Vera, R. Díaz-Uribe, R. Rodríguez-Vera, and R. Díaz-Uribe, Eds., SPIE, 2011, p. 80111R. doi: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.903315.

C. Iriarte-Cornejo, C. A. Arancibia-Bulnes, J. F. Hinojosa, and M. I. Peña-Cruz, “Effect of spatial resolution of heliostat surface characterization on its concentrated heat flux distribution,” Solar Energy, vol. 174, pp. 312–320, Nov. 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2018.09.020.

D. Kesseli, V. Chidurala, R. Gooch, and G. Zhu, “A Combined Computer Vision and Deep Learning Approach for Rapid Drone-Based Optical Characterization of Parabolic Troughs,” Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, vol. 145, no. 2, Aug. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4055172.

R. Morales-Sánchez, A. Lozano-Cancelas, A. Sánchez-González, and J. C. Castillo, “Detecting the Reflection of Heliostat Facets through Computer Vision,” p. 8.

M. Röger, C. Prahl, and S. Ulmer, “Heliostat Shape and Orientation by Edge Detection,” Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, vol. 132, no. 2, p. 021002, May 2010, doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4001400.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-20

How to Cite

Kesseli, D., Keshiro, M., Mitchell, R., & Zhu, G. (2023). A New Reflected Target Optical Assessment System: Stage 1 Development Results. SolarPACES Conference Proceedings, 1. https://doi.org/10.52825/solarpaces.v1i.618

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Measurement Systems, Devices, and Procedures

Funding data