Oil and Nitrate-Salt Coolant Trade-Offs With Crushed-Rock Heat Storage and CSP

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52825/solarpaces.v1i.628

Keywords:

Crushed Rock, Nitrate Salt, Heat-Transfer Oil, Concentrated Solar Power

Abstract

The large-scale use of wind or solar results in collapse of electricity prices at times of large wind or solar production.  Addition of heat storage to Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) plants enables (1) storing heat at times of high solar input, excess electricity production and low prices and (2) producing electricity when needed at times of high prices. We are developing a Crushed Rock Ultra-large Stored Heat (CRUSH) system with capital cost goals of $2-4/kWh that enables hourly to multi-week storage with very large CSP systems. Heat is stored in crushed rock piles up to 40 meters high in an insulated building. Hot oil or nitrate salt is sprinkled on the rock, trickles through the rock, heats the rock and the resultant cold fluid is recovered by drain pans. Heat is recovered by sprinkling cold oil or salt on hot rock, trickling through the rock, and heating the fluid with oil or nitrate salt recovered by drain pans. There are different constraints for oil versus salt systems. Given the high-cost of heat-transfer oils, rock sizes and types are chosen to minimize residual oil in the crushed rock. Nitrate salts are less expensive; however, nitrate salts will interact with many rock types placing constraints on acceptable rock types. Rock impurities in the oil or nitrate salt can impose constraints on the CSP system and define fluid-system cleanup requirements.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

C. W. Forsberg, April 2023. “Low-Cost Crushed-Rock Heat Storage with Oil or Salt Heat Transfer, Applied Energy, 335 (10). 120753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.120753

T. Bauer, C. Oderthal and A. Bonk, 11 February 2021. “Molten Salt Storage for Power Generation”, Chemie Ingenieur Technik. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.202000137

A. Caraballo, S. Galan-Casado, A. Caballero, and S. Serena, 23 February 2021. “Molten Salts for Sensible Thermal Energy Storage: A Review and an Energy Performance Analysis,” Energies, 14(4), 1197. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14041197

C. Turchi and G. Heath, 2013. Molten Salt Power Tower Cost Model for the System Advisor Model (SAM), NREL/TP-5500-57625. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy13osti/57625.pdf

F. Carlson and J. H. Davidson, 15 May 2021. “Parametric study of thermodynamic and cost performance of thermal energy storage coupled with nuclear power,” Energy and Conversion Management, 236, 114054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114054

C. W. Forsberg, “Separating Nuclear Reactors from the Power Block with Heat Storage to Improve Economics with Dispatchable Heat and Electricity”, August 2021. Nuclear Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2021.1947121

Natrium, 2021. https://natriumpower.com/

W. Conlon, 2019, “Decarbonizing with Energy Storage Combined Cycles,” POWER Magazine, December, pp 36-39. https://www.powermag.com/decarbonizing-with-energy-storage-combined-cycles/

Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2022. The Future of Energy Storage, An MIT Interdisciplinary Study, https://energy.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/The-Future-of-Energy-Storage.pdf

N. A. Sepulveda, et. al., 29 March 2021. “The Design Space for Long-Duration Energy Storage in Decarbonized Power Systems”, Nature Energy, 6, 506-516. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-021-00796-8

U.S. Energy Information Agency, August 2021. Battery Storage in the United States: an Update on Market Trends. https://www.eia.gov/analysis/studies/electricity/batterystorage/pdf/battery_storage_2021.pdf

U.S. Energy Information Agency, February 2022. Levelized Cost of New Generation Resources in the Annual Energy Outlook 2021. https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/pdf/electricity_generation.pdf

A. S. Aljefri, 2021. Technical and Economic Feasibility of Crushed Rock with Synthetic Oil Heat Storage Coupled to Light Water Reactors in the United Arab Emirates, Master Thesis, Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/139910/Aljefri-aljefri-sm-nse-2021-thesis.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

C. W. Forsberg, September 27-October 1, 2021. “1000-MW CSP with 100-Gigawatt-Hour Crushed-Rock Heat Storage to Replace Dispatchable Fossil-Fuel Electricity”, SolarPaces2021; Paper 7281. https://www.solarpaces.org/wp-content/uploads/100-Gigawatt-Hour-Crushed-Rock-Heat-Storage-for-CSP-and-Nuclear.pdf

D. Bandyopadhyay and C. W. Forsberg, May 2023. “Selecting Rock Types for Very-low-cost Crushed Rock Heat Storage Systems with Nitrate Salt Heat Transfer”, Journal of Energy Storage, Vol. 61, 106664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.106664

W. van der Merwe, C. Maree and W. Nicol, 2004. “Nature of Residual Liquid Holdup in Packed Beds of Spherical Particles”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res, 43, 8363-8368. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie0494521

A. M. Bonanos et al. 2019. “Engineering Aspects and Thermal Performance of Molten Salt Transfer Lines in Solar Power Applications”, Applied Thermal Engineering 154, 294-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.03.091

A. H. Slocum et al., 2011. “Concentrated Solar Power on Demand,” Solar Energy 85, 1519-1529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2011.04.010

Downloads

Published

2024-03-13

How to Cite

Forsberg, C. (2024). Oil and Nitrate-Salt Coolant Trade-Offs With Crushed-Rock Heat Storage and CSP. SolarPACES Conference Proceedings, 1. https://doi.org/10.52825/solarpaces.v1i.628

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Thermal Energy Storage Materials, Media, and Systems