A Method for Projecting Cloud Shadows Onto a Central Receiver Field to Predict Receiver Damage

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52825/solarpaces.v1i.650

Keywords:

Central Receiver, Solar Tower, Cloud Transient, DNI, Satellite, Total Sky Imager, All Sky Imager, Concentrating Solar Power (CSP)

Abstract

This work demonstrates methods of mapping high-spatial-resolution direct normal irradiance (DNI) data from satellites, Total Sky Imagers (TSIs), and analogous data sources onto a heliostat field for characterizing the spatial and temporal variation of the incident flux on a central receiver tower during cloud transient events. The mapping methods are incorporated into an optical software module that interfaces with CoPylot–SolarPILOT’s python API– to provide computationally efficient optical simulation of the heliostat field and the solar power tower. Eventually, this optical model will be incorporated into optimization models whereby a plant operator can understand the effects of cloud transient events on overall power production and receiver lifetime due to creep-fatigue damage and therefore make better informed decisions about receiver shutdown events. By more accurately modelling the effects of cloud events on receiver flux maps, this work may determine the magnitude and frequency of thermal cycling on receiver tubes and panels using actual or realistic cloud shapes instead of averaged DNI values–which may undercount the total cycle number. This work may also prevent unnecessary plant shutdowns due to overly precautionary control strategies and characterize the relative impact of various cloud types on receiver life. We plan to eventually integrate this methodology into the System Advisor Model (SAM) to improve performance model accuracy during periods of cloudiness. In this paper, we demonstrate generating DNI maps and mapping them to a solar field in CoPylot using 10 m resolution data from publicly available Sentinel-2 satellite data over the Crescent Dunes plant.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

N. Blair et al., “System Advisor Model (SAM) General Description (Version 2017.9.5),” 2018. [Online]. Available: www.nrel.gov/publications.

M. J. Wagner, W. T. Hamilton, A. Newman, J. Dent, C. Diep, and R. Braun, “Optimizing dispatch for a concentrated solar power tower,” Solar Energy, vol. 174, pp. 1198–1211, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2018.06.093.

J. L. Cox, W. T. Hamilton, A. M. Newman, M. J. Wagner, and A. J. Zolan, “Realtime dispatch optimization for concentrating solar power with thermal energy storage,” Optimization and Engineering, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-022-09711-w.

B. L. Kistler, “Fatigue analysis of a solar central receiver design using measured weather data,” Sandia National Lab.(SNL-CA), Livermore, CA (United States), 1987.

T. V. Narayanan, M. S. M. Rao, and G. Carli, “Structural design and life assessment of a molten salt solar receiver,” 1985, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3267688.

G. Carli, “Molten salt solar receiver subsystem research experiment. Phase 1, final report. Volume 1. Executive summary. Volume 2. Technical,” Foster Wheeler Solar Development Corp., Livingston, NJ (USA), 1984.

R. W. Bradshaw et al., “Final test and evaluation results from the solar two project,” Sandia National Lab.(SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States); Sandia …, 2002.

C. Schwager, C. J. T. Boura, R. Flesch, S. Alexopoulos, and U. Herrmann, “Improved efficiency prediction of a molten salt receiver based on dynamic cloud passage simulation,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, 2019, vol. 2126, no. 1, p. 030054.

F. Crespi, A. Toscani, P. Zani, D. Sánchez, and G. Manzolini, “Effect of passing clouds on the dynamic performance of a CSP tower receiver with molten salt heat storage,” Appl Energy, vol. 229, pp. 224–235, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.07.094.

B. Belhomme, R. Pitz-Paal, P. Schwarzbözl, and S. Ulmer, “A new fast ray tracing tool for high-precision simulation of heliostat fields,” Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, Transactions of the ASME, vol. 131, no. 3, pp. 0310021–0310028, Aug. 2009, doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3139139.

R. Rangel, D. Acosta, J. García, M. Sanjuan, R. Barraza, and H. Zambrano, “Effect of solar field aiming strategies on the fatigue life in molten salt external central receivers,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, May 2022, vol. 2445. doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0085673.

W. T. Hamilton, M. J. Wagner, and A. J. Zolan, “Demonstrating SolarPILOT’s Python API Through Heliostat Optimal Aimpoint Strategy Use Case: Preprint,” 2021. [Online]. Available: www.nrel.gov/publications.

M. J. Wagner and T. Wendelin, “SolarPILOT: A power tower solar field layout and characterization tool,” Solar Energy, vol. 171, pp. 185–196, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2018.06.063.

S. Quesada-Ruiz, Y. Chu, J. Tovar-Pescador, H. T. C. Pedro, and C. F. M. Coimbra, “Cloud-tracking methodology for intrahour DNI forecasting,” Solar Energy, vol. 102, pp. 267–275, 2014.

B. Nouri et al., “Determination of cloud transmittance for all sky imager based solar now-casting,” Solar Energy, vol. 181, pp. 251–263, Mar. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.02.004.

B. Nouri et al., “Nowcasting of DNI maps for the solar field based on voxel carving and individual 3D cloud objects from all sky images,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, Nov. 2018, vol. 2033. doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5067196.

P. Blanc et al., “Short-term forecasting of high resolution local DNI maps with multiple fish-eye cameras in stereoscopic mode,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, Jun. 2017, vol. 1850. doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4984512.

Z. Peng, D. Yu, D. Huang, J. Heiser, S. Yoo, and P. Kalb, “3D cloud detection and tracking system for solar forecast using multiple sky imagers,” Solar Energy, vol. 118, pp. 496–519, Aug. 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2015.05.037.

“ARM Total Sky Imager Datasets,” Aug. 16, 2022. (accessed Sep. 13, 2022). https://www.arm.gov/capabilities/instruments/tsi

H. T. C. Pedro, D. P. Larson, and C. F. M. Coimbra, “A comprehensive dataset for the accelerated development and benchmarking of solar forecasting methods,” Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, vol. 11, no. 3, p. 036102, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5094494.

M. 202 et al., “Concentrating Solar Power Best Practices Study,” 2020. [Online]. Available: www.nrel.gov/publications.

N. Minis, E. Rosenbluth, R. Hayut, and M. Am-Shallem, “Spatial DNI measurement for accurate solar flux control in Megalim 121MWe solar receiver power plant,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, 2019, vol. 2126, no. 1, p. 030037.

M. Sengupta, A. Habte, S. Wilbert, C. Gueymard, and J. Remund, “Best Practices Handbook for the Collection and Use of Solar Resource Data for Solar Energy Applications: Third Edition,” 2021. [Online]. Available: www.nrel.gov/publications.

“National Solar Radiation Database,” Sep. 06, 2022. https://nsrdb.nrel.gov/ (accessed Sep. 13, 2022).

T. Sirch, L. Bugliaro, T. Zinner, M. Möhrlein, and M. Vazquez-Navarro, “Cloud and DNI nowcasting with MSG/SEVIRI for the optimized operation of concentrating solar power plants,” Atmos Meas Tech, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 409–429, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-409-2017.

K. Tarrio et al., “Comparison of cloud detection algorithms for Sentinel-2 imagery,” Science of Remote Sensing, vol. 2, p. 100010, Dec. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srs.2020.100010.

J. A. Duffie and W. A. Beckman, Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes, 4th ed. Wiley, 2013.

W. E. Lorensen and H. E. Cline, “Marching cubes: A high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm,” ACM siggraph computer graphics, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 163–169, 1987, https://doi.org/10.1145/37402.37422.

“Scikit-image Documentation - Module: measure.find_contours.” https://scikit-image.org/docs/0.8.0/api/skimage.measure.findcontours.html (accessed Sep. 13, 2022).

Q. Wu, “geemap: A Python package for interactive mapping with Google Earth Engine,” J Open Source Softw, vol. 5, no. 51, p. 2305, Jul. 2020, doi: https://www.doi.org/10.21105/joss.02305.

M. Main-Knorn, B. Pflug, J. Louis, V. Debaecker, U. Müller-Wilm, and F. Gascon, “Sen2Cor for Sentinel-2,” Oct. 2017, p. 3. doi: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2278218.

“Sentinel-2 Cloud Masking with s2cloudless,” Sep. 06, 2022. (accessed Sep. 13, 2022). https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/tutorials/community/sentinel-2-s2cloudless

C. Draxl, A. Clifton, B. M. Hodge, and J. McCaa, “The Wind Integration National Dataset (WIND) Toolkit,” Appl Energy, vol. 151, pp. 355–366, Aug. 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.03.121.

M. J. Wagner, “SolarPILOT Open-Source Software Project,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado, 2018. github.com/NREL/SolarPILOT. (accessed Sep. 14, 2022).

Downloads

Published

2024-02-02

How to Cite

Mullin, M., & Wagner, M. (2024). A Method for Projecting Cloud Shadows Onto a Central Receiver Field to Predict Receiver Damage. SolarPACES Conference Proceedings, 1. https://doi.org/10.52825/solarpaces.v1i.650

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Operations, Maintenance, and Component Reliability

Funding data