Pathways to IEC Standards for Heliostat Design Qualification and Site Acceptance in Central Receiver CSP Applications

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52825/solarpaces.v1i.652

Keywords:

Heliostat, Standard, Specification, IEC, Beam, Tracking, Qualification

Abstract

This paper surveys the existing landscape of standards relevant to heliostats, identifies their gaps, and proposes a path forward to a comprehensive set of heliostat guidelines, technical specifications, and standards under the framework of International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) TC 117. Gaps in existing guidelines and standards are surveyed using a three-tiered taxonomy: component-level, heliostat-level, and field-level. At each level, the gap analysis is followed by a proposal for a coordinated path forward on the development of standards. At the component level, advances in the understanding of wind loading should inform a technical specification for drives and structures. Reflectors require consolidation of measurement guidelines into existing standards documents. Communications & controls require technical standards to inform their selection and secure implementation. At the heliostat level, IEC 62817 (solar trackers) adequately characterizes drive systems, structures, and electronics, but requires adaptation to heliostats’ use patterns, operating modes, and expected life cycles. IEC 62817 does not address heliostat beam quality and pointing accuracy, but the process for determining both is elaborated in the SolarPACES Guideline for Heliostat Performance Testing.  This SolarPACES document requires two main modifications: adaptation to IEC language and inclusion of testing after heliostats which have undergone accelerated weathering and mechanical cycling (to understand performance degradation). At the field level, IEC 62862-4-2 addresses the function and control of heliostat fields but does not cover the statistically rigorous testing of heliostat groups, or field performance factors like security and soiling. The addition of documents under IEC-62862-4 is proposed to address this gap.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

J. Wohlgemuth, “2012 PV Module Reliability Workshop,” p. 24.

“IEC - TC 117 Dashboard > Projects: Work programme, Publications, Maintenance cycle, Project files, TC/SC in figures.” https://www.iec.ch/dyn/www/f?p=103:38:511378060577410::::FSP_ORG_ID,FSP_APEX_PAGE,FSP_PROJECT_ID:7851,23,105218 (accessed May 09, 2022).

“Specifications | IEC.” https://www.iec.ch/publications/specifications (accessed Aug. 17, 2022).

M. Röger, K. Blume, T. Schlichting, and M. Collins, “Status update of the SolarPACES heliostat testing activities,” presented at the SOLARPACES 2020: 26th International Conference on Concentrating Solar Power and Chemical Energy Systems, Freiburg, Germany, 2022, p. 070010. doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0087037.

International Electrotechnical Commission, “62862-3-5: General requirements for the design of solar tower plants.” Approved for Committee Draft 2021.

International Electrotechnical Commission, “62862-3-6: DURABILITY OF SILVERED-GLASS REFLECTORS FOR CONCENTRATING SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES.” Approved for Committee Draft 2021.

J. Coventry et al., Heliostat Cost Down Scoping Study - Final Report. 2016.

J. A. Peterka, Z. Tan, J. E. Cermak, and B. Bienkiewicz, “Mean and Peak Wind Loads on Heliostats,” Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 158–164, May 1989, doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3268302.

C. K. Ho et al., “Dynamic Testing and Analysis of Heliostats to Evaluate Impacts of Wind on Optical Performance and Structural Fatigue,” p. 14, 2012.

M. J. Emes, F. Ghanadi, M. Arjomandi, and R. M. Kelso, “Investigation of peak wind loads on tandem heliostats in stow position,” Renewable Energy, vol. 121, pp. 548–558, Jun. 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.01.080.

“Heliostat Wind Loads,” Centre for Energy Technology | University of Adelaide. https://www.adelaide.edu.au/cet/technologies/heliostat-wind-loads (accessed Apr. 06, 2022).

American Society of Civil Engineers, Ed., Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures: this document uses both the International System of Units (SI) and customary units, 2. print. in ASCE standard ASCE/SEI, no. 7–10. Reston, Va: ASCE, American Society of Civil Engineers, 2011.

International Electrotechnical Commission, 62817: Design Qualification of Solar Trackers. in 62817. 2017.

International Electrotechnical Commission, “62862-4-1: General requirements for the design of solar tower plants.” FDIS circulated 2022.

International Electrotechnical Commission, “62862-4-2: Heliostat Field Control System.” Approved for Committee Draft 2022.

K. Mabusela, C. P. Kruger, B. J. Silva, and G. P. Hancke, “Design of a wireless heliostat system,” in AFRICON 2015, Sep. 2015, pp. 1–5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/AFRCON.2015.7332011.

J. C. Sattler et al., “Review of heliostat calibration and tracking control methods,” Solar Energy, vol. 207, pp. 110–132, Sep. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.06.030.

SolarPACES, “PARAMETERS AND METHOD TO EVALUATE THE REFLECTANCE PROPERTIES OF REFLECTOR MATERIALS FOR CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER TECHNOLOGY UNDER LABORATORY CONDITIONS.” Draft.

F. Sutter, J. Wette, A. Fernández-García, S. Ziegler, and R. Dasbach, “ACCELERATED AGING TESTING OF ALUMINUM REFLECTORS FOR CONCENTRATED SOLAR POWER,” p. 8.

SolarPACES, “Recommendations for reflectance measurements on soiled solar mirrors.”

T. Farrell, F. Burkholder, and G. Zhu, “Measurement and Reporting Guidelines for Solar Mirror Aging Test by Using Xenon Arc Lamp Exposure (XALE) Chamber,” p. 14.

M. Röger, “SolarPACES Guideline for Heliostat Performance Testing.” Aug. 2018.

B. Smith and R. Brost, “Sandia Optical Fringe Analysis Slope Tool (SOFAST) Improvement Effort: Final Report.,” SAND2022-0187, 1855054, 702684, Jan. 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.2172/1855054.

D. Nieffer, T. Effertz, A. Macke, M. Röger, G. Weinrebe, and S. Ulmer, “Heliostat testing according to SolarPACES task III guideline,” presented at the SOLARPACES 2018: International Conference on Concentrating Solar Power and Chemical Energy Systems, Casablanca, Morocco, 2019, p. 030039. doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5117551.

R. A. Mitchell and G. Zhu, “A non-intrusive optical (NIO) approach to characterize heliostats in utility-scale power tower plants: Methodology and in-situ validation,” Solar Energy, vol. 209, pp. 431–445, Oct. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.09.004.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-07

How to Cite

Tsvankin, D., & Muller, M. (2024). Pathways to IEC Standards for Heliostat Design Qualification and Site Acceptance in Central Receiver CSP Applications. SolarPACES Conference Proceedings, 1. https://doi.org/10.52825/solarpaces.v1i.652

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Operations, Maintenance, and Component Reliability

Funding data