Adaption of Collector Orientation for Parabolic Trough Plants in High Latitude Regions

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52825/solarpaces.v2i.793

Keywords:

Collector Orientation, High Latitude Regions, Parabolic Trough, Solar Field

Abstract

North-South (N-S) orientation of trough collectors is a common design for parabolic trough plants, which typically provides the maximum annual production. However, such orientation is neither the only one option nor an appropriate solution, especially in high latitude like 40º or higher regions. In actual practises, significant monthly production difference is obtained using N-S orientation due to the so-called “cosine” effect. In this paper, East-West (E-W) orientation option is analysed using System Advisor Model developed by NREL. Results show that annual thermal energy incident on receiver tubes can be increased when using E-W orientation in high latitude regions. The higher the latitude, the more the energy gain. Besides, a more uniform monthly thermal energy incident on receiver tubes can be also obtained for E-W orientation, which leads to more stable monthly outputs of the plant, as well as higher utilization rate of the thermal energy storage system. Further analysis shows that row distance between collectors can be reduced at the same cost of incident solar energy losses, resulting in an appreciable savings of land, piping, insulation, HTF inventory, etc., and finally CAPEX and OPEX. Extensive study indicates collector orientation can be along arbitrary direction, and final decision shall be made considering specific site conditions and local energy needs. In conclusion, N-S orientation of collectors is not always the only option for parabolic trough plants. E-W or other orientation rather than N-S orientation shall be carefully analyzed, especially in 40º or higher latitude regions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M. Mehos, H. Price, R. Cable, D. Kearney, B. Kelly, G. Kolb, F. Morse, “Parabolic Trough Technology” in Concentrating Solar Power Best Practices Study. Golden, CO, U.S.A.: NREL Technical Report NREL/TP-5500-75763, 2020, ch. 5, sec.5.3.1, pp. 135-136. (https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy20osti/75763.pdf)

G. Brakmann, M. Dolejsi, “Optimizing Solar Field Layout”, CSP Today South Africa 2015, Cape Town, South Africa, April 14-15, 2015. (http://www.solengco.com/publications/2015-4-OptimizingSolarFieldLayout.pdf)

CSTA China Solar Thermal Alliance, “Operations of National CSP Demonstration Pro-jects” in Blue Book of China’s Concentrating Solar Power Industry 2022. China: 2023, ch. 3, sec. 3.1, pp. 33-34. (http://en.cnste.org/uploads/soft/230302/1_1717006881.pdf )

CSPPlaza, “Annual production 330 GWh – Urat Project Renewed Production Record” (in Chinese). Published on Apr 8, 2023. (https://cspplaza.com/article-22960-1.html)

CSPPlaza, “New Record for Monthly Production of Urat Project” (in Chinese). Published on July 26, 2023. (https://cspplaza.com/article-23526-1.html)

CSPPlaza, “Around 10 GW Production in January and 550 GWh Accumulated Production since Commercial Operation for Urat projet” (in Chinese). Published on Feb 27, 2023. (https://cspplaza.com/article-22828-1.html)

Global Solar Atlas, “Map and data downloads – China – Direct normal irradiation”. (https://globalsolaratlas.info/download/china)

Downloads

Published

2025-05-12

How to Cite

Lu, Z. (2025). Adaption of Collector Orientation for Parabolic Trough Plants in High Latitude Regions. SolarPACES Conference Proceedings, 2. https://doi.org/10.52825/solarpaces.v2i.793
Received 2023-10-05
Accepted 2025-01-07
Published 2025-05-12

Funding data