Robotic Fibre Winding Reinforcement

Fundamental Structural Engineering Principles

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52825/ocp.v7i.2777

Keywords:

GFRP, Testing , Analysis, Anchorage Length

Abstract

The Digital Fabrication with Concrete (DFC) enables freedom of form. In order to fully leverage this freedom, the reinforcement should be rethought, as well. Such an opportunity is provided by the Robotic Fibre Winding (RFW). This in-situ and on-demand produced fibre reinforced polymer reinforcement can provide endless strands, which can be either digitally deposited on concrete (concrete defines the form) or on a frame with subsequent application of concrete (reinforcement defines the form), and combined particularly successful with the digital shotcrete or Shotcrete 3D Printing (SC3DP).

The current paper critically analyses the results of the three previously published experimental campaigns with glass fibre wound reinforcement: 1) one set of pull-out and direct tensile tests with various RFW reinforcement types embedded in cast concrete, and 2) two sets of four-point bending tests with two different RFW reinforcement types. In all cases the experimental results are re-analysed from the structural engineering point of view, with the special consideration of anchorage length required for the full activation of reinforcement.

On basis of the obtained results it is concluded, that despite theoretically good bond, resulting in required anchorage comparable to this of classical steel bars, many bending tests unexpectedly ended in pull-out failure. Hence, the mode of pull-out failure should be carefully observed in the upcoming experiments. Likewise, the focus should be put in the future on collection of all relevant data required for such detailed investigation of the bonding zone.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] T. Rothe, S. Gantner, N. Hack, and C. Hühne, ‘A Dynamic Winding Process of Individu-alized Fibre Reinforcement Structures for Additive Manufacturing in Construction’, Open Conference Proceedings, vol. 3, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.52825/ocp.v3i.187.

[2] T. Rothe, J. Pösch, S. Gantner, N. Hack, and C. Hühne, ‘Optimization of tensile proper-ties and bond behaviour to concrete of fibre reinforcement strands produced within a dynamic fibre winding process’, presented at the 11th International Conference on FPR Composites in Civil Engineering, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, 2023.

[3] H. Kloft et al., ‘Interaction of reinforcement, process, and form in Digital Fabrication with Concrete’, Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 186, p. 107640, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2024.107640.

[4] S. Gantner et al., ‘Robotic frame winding: prefabricated fibre structures as formwork and reinforcement for digitally fabricated shell-like concrete elements’, Constr Robot, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 12, May 2025, doi: 10.1007/s41693-025-00154-0.

[5] S. Gantner, P. Rennen, T. Rothe, C. Hühne, and N. Hack, ‘Core Winding: Force-Flow Oriented Fibre Reinforcement in Additive Manufacturing with Concrete’, in Third RILEM International Conference on Concrete and Digital Fabrication, R. Buswell, A. Blanco, S. Cavalaro, and P. Kinnell, Eds., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022, pp. 391–396. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-06116-5_58.

[6] P. Rennen et al., ‘Robotic knitcrete: computational design and fabrication of a pedestrian bridge using robotic shotcrete on a 3D-Knitted formwork’, Front. Built Environ., vol. 9, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2023.1269000.

[7] P. Rennen et al., ‘Structural Evaluation of Shotcrete 3D Printing and Robotic Fiber Wind-ing for Thin Shell Elements’, 2024.

[8] B. Sawicki, E. Brühwiler, and E. Denarié, ‘Inverse Analysis of R-UHPFRC Beams to Determine the Flexural Response under Service Loading and at Ultimate Resistance’, J. Struct. Eng., vol. 148, no. 2, p. 04021260, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003239.

[9] RILEM RC6, RC 6 Bond test for reinforcement steel. 2. Pull-out test, 1983. Accessed: Jun. 24, 2025. [Online]. Available: https:///https://www.rilem.net/publication/publication/4?id_papier=4020

[10] P. R. Shunmuga Vembu and A. K. Ammasi, ‘A Comprehensive Review on the Factors Affecting Bond Strength in Concrete’, Buildings, vol. 13, no. 3, Art. no. 3, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.3390/buildings13030577.

[11] EC2, Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures-Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings, EN 1992-1-1, 2005.

[12] SIA 2052, ‘Technical Leaflet SIA 2052, UHPFRC - Materials, design and construction, Swiss Society of Engineers and Architects, Zurich’. Swiss Society of Engineers and Ar-chitects, Zurich, 2017.

[13] AFGC, Ultra High Performance Fibre-Reinforced Concretes, Recommendations, Re-vised edition, June 2013. in Documents scientifiques et techniques (édition AFGC). As-sociation Francaise de Genie Civil, 2013. Accessed: Jun. 17, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.afgc.asso.fr/app/uploads/2007/10/Recommandations-BFUP-Juin-2013.pdf

[14] B. Sawicki and E. Brühwiler, ‘Experimental and Analytical Investigation of Deflection of R-UHPFRC Beams Subjected to Loading–Unloading’, International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 6, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1186/s40069-023-00636-x.

[15] MC Bauchemie, ‘Nafufill KM 250 Technical Datasheet’. MC-Bauchemie Müller GmbH & Co. KG, Jun. 2025. Accessed: Jul. 18, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://pim.mc-bauche-mie.de/media/MCBAUCHEMIEData/DO/base/Nafufill_KM_250_DE_DE_EN_TDS.pdf

[16] J. Huang and V. C. Li, ‘A meso-mechanical model of the tensile behaviour of concrete. part II: modelling of post-peak tension softening behaviour’, Composites, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 370–378, Jul. 1989, doi: 10.1016/0010-4361(89)90662-9.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-12

How to Cite

Sawicki, B., Hack, N., & Kloft, H. (2025). Robotic Fibre Winding Reinforcement: Fundamental Structural Engineering Principles. Open Conference Proceedings, 7. https://doi.org/10.52825/ocp.v7i.2777

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Contributions to the symposium "Visions and Strategies for Reinforcing Additively Manufactured Constructions 2025"
Received 2025-06-02
Accepted 2025-10-06
Published 2025-12-12

Funding data