A Critical Materials Perspective on 3DCP
Extractive Practices and Environmental Scalability in AM for Construction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52825/ocp.v7i.2795Keywords:
3DCP , LCA, Abiotic Depletion PotentialAbstract
The current state of the art in assessing the environmental impact of 3D Concrete Printing (3DCP) technologies has focused especially on the material impacts, given the known issues posed by concrete. By contrast, 3DCP machinery impacts remain mostly unknown, with only few studies examining the equipment necessary to additive manufacturing and evaluating their impact with Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA) techniques. Taking point of departure in 3DCP as a case study, the research examines the usual assumption in the construction industry that materials impacts outweigh significantly machine impacts and that the latter can therefore remain out of scope of standard LCAs of buildings and building products. Assessing different concrete additive manufacturing (3DCP) wall typologies and focusing on the amounts of critical materials present in the system, the research compares the presence of such resources in the material and the set-up as well as the consequences for abiotic depletion and the scaling up of AM practices in the AEC industry (Architecture, Engineering and Construction). Highlighting the risk of significant impact transfer in some of the evaluated scenarios, the research advocates for a systematic impact of machinery impacts in 3DCP.
Downloads
References
[1] Kuzmenko, K., Gaudillière, N., Feraille, A., Dirrenberger, J. & Baverel, O. (2020). Assessing the environmental viability of 3D concrete printing technology. In Impact: Design With All Senses: Proceedings of the Design Modelling Symposium, Berlin 2019 (pp. 517-528). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29829-6_40
[2] Saint-Gobain Weber Benelux (2025) Environmental Product Declaration Weber 3D ECO (BB EIH), ReTHiNK-97631. https://www.3d.weber/media/pages/news/now-available-epds-for-our-3d-concrete-mortars/5573ec75ca-1748248755/epd_weber-3d-eco_-bb-eindhoven.pdf
[3] Heywood, K. (2025). Additive Manufacturing Processes for Architectural Design: Rethinking 3DCP through a lens of Sustainability. Doctoral Thesis, Royal Danish Academy.https://adk.elsevierpure.com/en/publications/additive-manufacturing-processes-for-architectural-design-rethink
[4] Heywood, K., & Nicholas, P. (2024, April). 3D Concrete Printing in a Circular Economy: What we can learn from a 3DCP slab designed for dissassembly. In CAADRIA 2024-ACCELERATED DESIGN: he 29th Annual Conference for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA) (pp. 271-280). https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.caadria.2024.3.271
[5] International Organization for Standardization: ISO 14040-14044. https://www.iso.org/standard/38498.html
[6] Center for Sustainable Systems, University of Michigan (2024). “Critical Materials Factsheet.” Pub. No. CSS14-15. https://css.umich.edu/sites/default/files/2024-10/Critical%20Materials_CSS14-15.pdf
[7] Ibrahim Dincer, Azzam Abu-Rayash, Chapter 6 - Sustainability modeling, Editor(s): Ibrahim Dincer, Azzam Abu-Rayash, Energy Sustainability, Academic Press, 2020, Pages 119-164, ISBN 9780128195567. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819556-7.00006-1.
[8] van Oers, L., Guinée, J. B., & Heijungs, R. (2020). Abiotic resource depletion potentials (ADPs) for elements revisited—updating ultimate reserve estimates and introducing time series for production data. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 25(2), 294-308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01683-x
[9] Arash Motalebi, Mohammad Abu Hasan Khondoker, Golam Kabir, A systematic review of life cycle assessments of 3D concrete printing, Sustainable Operations and Computers, Volume 5, 2024, Pages 41-50, ISSN 2666-4127.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2023.08.003.
[10] Matheus Pimentel Tinoco, Érica Martinho de Mendonça, Letícia Ikeda Castrillon Fernandez, Lucas Rosse Caldas, Oscar Aurelio Mendoza Reales, Romildo Dias Toledo Filho, Life cycle assessment (LCA) and environmental sustainability of cementitious materials for 3D concrete printing: A systematic literature review, Journal of Building Engineering, Volume 52, 2022, 104456, ISSN 2352-7102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104456
[11] Khan, S. A., Koç, M., & Al-Ghamdi, S. G. (2021). Sustainability assessment, potentials and challenges of 3D printed concrete structures: A systematic review for built environmental applications. Journal of Cleaner Production, 303, 127027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127027
[12] Gosselin, C., Duballet, R., Roux, P., Gaudillière, N., Dirrenberger, J., & Morel, P. (2016). Large-scale 3D printing of ultra-high performance concrete–a new processing route for architects and builders. Materials & Design, 100, 102-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.097
[13] Huijbregts, M. A., Steinmann, Z. J., Elshout, P. M., Stam, G., Verones, F., Vieira, M., Zijp, M. Hollander, A. & Van Zelm, R. (2017). ReCiPe2016: a harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level. The international journal of life cycle assessment, 22(2), 138-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1246-y
[14] De Soto, B. G., Agustí-Juan, I., Hunhevicz, J., Joss, S., Graser, K., Habert, G., & Adey, B. T. (2018). Productivity of digital fabrication in construction: Cost and time analysis of a robotically built wall. Automation in construction, 92, 297-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.04.004
[15] U.S. Geological Survey, 2025, Mineral commodity summaries 2025 (ver. 1.2, March 2025): U.S. Geological Survey, 212 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/mcs2025.
[16] Faludi, J., Baumers, M., Maskery, I. & Hague, R. (2017). Environmental Impacts of Selective Laser Melting: Do Printer,vPowder, Or Power Dominate?. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21: S144-S156. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12528
[17] Gaudillière-Jami, N. (2025). AM in construction. Taking environmental scalability into consideration. In Iurio, O., Wolf, A., Figueiredo, B., Knaack, U., Cruz, P.J.S. (eds.) AM Perspectives 2. Research in Advanced Manufacturing for Architecture and Construction, pp. 26-36. https://doi.org/10.47982/eqdj0367
[18] Ozcan-Deniz, G., & Zhu, Y. (2013). Analyzing the effect of equipment selection on the global warming potential of construction projects. In ICCREM 2013: Construction and Operation in the Context of Sustainability (pp. 247-257). https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413135.023
[19] Rakhmawati, A. N., Devia, Y. P., & Wijatmiko, I. (2020). Life cycle assessment (LCA) analysis of concrete slab construction for estimating the environmental impact. Rekayasa Sipil, 14(3), 232-237. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.rekayasasipil.2020.014.03.10
[20] Roussilhe, G., Ligozat, A. L., & Quinton, S. (2023). A long road ahead: a review of the state of knowledge of the environmental effects of digitization. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 62, 101296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101296
[21] Weber (2024) Environmental Product Declaration weber REP 38 Cast concrete SR C35/45-8, EPD-IES-0017505. https://www.fi.weber/files/fi/2025-01/weber-REP-38-Valubetoni-SR-C35-45-8-EPD-ymparistoseloste-EN.pdf
[22] KrampeHarex (2023). Environmental Production Declaration Steel fibre with hooked ends, NEPD-4605-3859-EN. https://www.environdec.com/library/epd8154
[23] Galluccio, G., Tamke, M., Nicholas, P., Svilans, T., Gaudillière-Jami, N., & Thomsen, M. R. (2024, June). Material Stories: Assessing Sustainability of Digital Fabrication with Bio-Based Materials through LCA. In The International Conference on Net-Zero Civil Infrastructures: Innovations in Materials, Structures, and Management Practices (NTZR) (pp. 25-37). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-69626-8_3
Published
How to Cite
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nadja Gaudillière-Jami
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Accepted 2025-12-01
Published 2025-12-12