Evaluation of Continuous Epoxy-Impregnated Carbon Fibre Reinforcement in a 3D-Printable Geopolymer Composite

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52825/ocp.v7i.2874

Keywords:

Geopolymer, Continuous Fibre Reinforcement, Carbon Fibre Impregnation, Fresh-in-Fresh-Embedding, Pullout Strength, Flexural Strength, Fibre-Matrix Adhesion, Microstructural Analysis

Abstract

This study investigates the potential of geopolymer reinforcement for extrusion-based 3D printing using in-situ impregnation of continuous carbon fibre. The geopolymer is composed of fly ash, ground granulated blast furnace slag and an activator, specifically developed for 3D printing. Although 3DCP has seen significant advancements in recent years, structural reinforcement remains a largely unresolved challenge. In conventional concrete construction, steel reinforcement is used to withstand tensile forces that cannot be absorbed by the mineral building material alone, creating the composite material reinforced concrete. For additive manufacturing to remain competitive, printed concrete must offer comparable quality and performance, without compromising the benefits of geometric freedom, digital design, and automation. The use of continuous carbon fibre strands with a functional epoxy resin infiltration enables strong adhesion between the fibre and the geopolymer matrix, allowing for layer-wise reinforcement in tensile zones. Moreover, clinker-free geopolymers activated by highly alkaline solutions offer a more sustainable alternative by significantly reducing CO₂ emissions. Various combinations of geopolymer matrix and carbon fibre reinforcement are evaluated through three-point bending tests to determine flexural tensile strength, and through pull-out tests to assess peak load. Microscopic investigations using light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) are conducted to analyse the interfacial bonding between fibre, geopolymer, and epoxy resin. The results demonstrate that embedding impregnated fibres "fresh-in-fresh" provides the most effective fibre–mortar bond, without limiting shape flexibility during printing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] S. Lim, R. Buswell, T. Le, R. Wackrow, S. Austin, A. Gibb, T. Thorpe, Development of a Viable Concrete Printing Process, in: 28th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC 2011), n.d. https://doi.org/10.22260/ISARC2011/0124.

[2] M. Sando, D. Stephan, The role of mixing sequence in shaping the 3D-printability of geo-polymers, Case Studies in Construction Materials 22 (2025) e04352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2025.e04352.

[3] M. Sando, D. Stephan, Online monitoring for 3D printable geopolymers: Automated slug test analysis with image analysis revealing mixing sequence effects, Construction and Building Materials 490 (2025) 142480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.142480.

[4] H. Kloft, M. Empelmann, N. Hack, E. Herrmann, D. Lowke, Reinforcement strategies for 3D‐concrete‐printing, Civil Engineering Design 2 (2020) 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1002/cend.202000022.

[5] O. Zaid, M.H. El Ouni, Advancements in 3D printing of cementitious materials: A review of mineral additives, properties, and systematic developments, Construction and Building Materials 427 (2024) 136254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136254.

[6] Carbocon, The carbon concrete principal, (n.d.). https://www.carbocon.de/en/carbon-concrete/ (accessed September 9, 2025).

[7] F.C. Campbell, ed., Structural composite materials, ASM International, Materials Park, Ohio, 2010.

[8] T. Neef, S. Müller, V. Mechtcherine, Integrating continuous mineral-impregnated carbon fibers into digital fabrication with concrete, Materials & Design 239 (2024) 112794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2024.112794.

[9] Y. Liu, B. Zwingmann, M. Schlaich, Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer for Cable Struc-tures—A Review, Polymers 7 (2015) 2078–2099. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym7101501.

[10] A. Carolin, Carbon fibre reinforced polymers for strengthening of structural elements, Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Re-sources Engineering, 2003. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-16879.

[11] J.G. Teng, T. Yu, D. Fernando, Strengthening of steel structures with fiber-reinforced polymer composites, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 78 (2012) 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.06.011.

[12] D.S. Vijayan, A. Sivasuriyan, P. Devarajan, A. Stefańska, Ł. Wodzyński, E. Koda, Carbon Fibre-Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) Composites in Civil Engineering Application—A Com-prehensive Review, Buildings 13 (2023) 1509. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13061509.

[13] E. Ivaniuk, S. Müller, T. Neef, V. Mechtcherine, Strategies for Integrating Reinforcement Into 3D Concrete Printing at the TU Dresden, Open Conf Proc 1 (2022) 23–34. https://doi.org/10.52825/ocp.v1i.73.

[14] T. Marchment, J. Sanjayan, Mesh reinforcing method for 3D Concrete Printing, Automa-tion in Construction 109 (2020) 102992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102992.

[15] L. Gebhard, J. Mata-Falcón, A. Iqbal, W. Kaufmann, Structural behaviour of post-installed reinforcement for 3D concrete printed shells – A case study on water tanks, Construction and Building Materials 366 (2023) 130163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.130163.

[16] L. Gebhard, P. Bischof, A. Anton, J. Mata-Falcón, B. Dillenburger, W. Kaufmann, Pre-installed Reinforcement for 3D Concrete Printing, in: A.B. Richard Buswell Sergio Caval-aro, Peter Kinnell (Ed.), Digital Concrete 2022, Sringer Cham, n.d.: pp. 430–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06116-5_64.

[17] Z. Xia, J. Geng, Z. Zhou, G. Liu, Comparative analysis of polypropylene, basalt, and steel fibers in 3D printed concrete: Effects on flowability, printabiliy, rheology, and mechanical performance, Construction and Building Materials 465 (2025) 140098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.140098.

[18] F.P. Bos, Z.Y. Ahmed, R.J.M. Wolfs, T.A.M. Salet, 3D Printing Concrete with Reinforce-ment, in: D. Hordijk Luković, M. (Ed.), High Tech Concrete: Where Technology and En-gineering Meet, Sringer Cham, 2018: pp. 2484–2493. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59471-2_283.

[19] J.-F. Caron, N. Ducoulombier, L. Demont, V. Bono, R. Mesnil, 3D Printing of Continuous-Fibers Cementitious Composites, Open Conf Proc 3 (2023). https://doi.org/10.52825/ocp.v3i.193.

[20] J.H. Lim, B. Panda, Q.-C. Pham, Improving flexural characteristics of 3D printed geopol-ymer composites with in-process steel cable reinforcement, Construction and Building Materials 178 (2018) 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.010.

[21] L. Demont, N. Ducoulombier, R. Mesnil, J.-F. Caron, Flow-based pultrusion of continuous fibers for cement-based composite material and additive manufacturing: rheological and technological requirements, Composite Structures 262 (2021) 113564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113564.

[22] W. Dong, J. Zhao, B. Yang, M. Liebscher, V. Mechtcherine, Early strength enhancement of cementitious mineral-impregnated carbon fibre (MCF) reinforcements via electric Joule heating, Construction and Building Materials 489 (2025) 142231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.142231.

[23] C. Signorini, A.H. Ahmed, M. Liebscher, J. Zhao, T. Köberle, V. Mechtcherine, Hybrid fibre-reinforced cementitious composites with short polyethylene and continue carbon fi-bres: Influence of roving impregnation on tensile and cracking behaviour, Materials & De-sign 248 (2024) 113465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2024.113465.

[24] J. Zhao, P. van Tai, A.B. Rezaie, B. Fan, M. Liebscher, V. Mechtcherine, Enhanced im-pregnation quality, interfacial bonding, and mechanical performance of cementitious min-eral-impregnated carbon fiber reinforcements through tailored fiber sizing, Composites Part B: Engineering 305 (2025) 112707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2025.112707.

[25] J. Bielak, J. Schöneberg, M. Classen, J. Hegger, Shear capacity of continuous concrete slabs with CFRP reinforcement, Construction and Building Materials 320 (2022) 126117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126117.

[26] M. Glowania, T. Gries, J. Schoene, M. Schleser, U. Reisgen, Innovative Coating Tech-nology for Textile Reinforcements of Concrete Applications, KEM 466 (2011) 167–173. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.466.167.

[27] M. Scheurer, G. Dittel, M. Kalthoff, M. Raupach, T. Matschei, T. Gries, Evaluation of Properties of Impregnated Reinforcement Textiles Cured Within Concrete for Applica-tions in Concrete Extrusion, in: A. Ilki, D. Çavunt, Y.S. Çavunt (Eds.), Building for the Fu-ture: Durable, Sustainable, Resilient, Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2023: pp. 1293–1302. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32519-9_131.

[28] M. Scheurer, M. Kalthoff, T. Matschei, M. Raupach, T. Gries, Analysis of Curing and Mechanical Performance of Pre-Impregnated Carbon Fibers Cured within Concrete, Tex-tiles 2 (2022) 657–672. https://doi.org/10.3390/textiles2040038.

[29] M. Scheurer, D. Friese, P. Penzel, G. Dittel, S. Bhat, V. Overhage, L. Hahn, K. Heins, C. Cherif, T. Gries, Current and Future Trends in Textiles for Concrete Construction Applica-tions, Textiles 3 (2023) 408–437. https://doi.org/10.3390/textiles3040025.

[30] V. Bilek, S. Bonczková, J. Hurta, D. Pytlík, M. Mrovec, Bond Strength Between Reinforc-ing Steel and Different Types of Concrete, Procedia Engineering 190 (2017) 243–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.05.333.

[31] Eurocode 2 – Background and applications – Design of concrete buildings. Worked ex-amples, Publications Office of the European Union, n.d. https://doi.org/10.2788/35386.

[32] Q. Yuan, J. Yang, K. Zhang, X. Long, Q. Li, J. Zou, Interfacial bonding properties of novel strand steel fiber and cement matrix: Experimental and analytical investigations, Con-struction and Building Materials 472 (2025) 140835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.140835.

[33] M.G. Alberti, A. Enfedaque, J.C. Gálvez, A. Ferreras, Pull-out behaviour and interface critical parameters of polyolefin fibres embedded in mortar and self-compacting concrete matrixes, Construction and Building Materials 112 (2016) 607–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.128.

[34] R. Devaraj, A. Olofinjana, C. Gerber, On the Factors That Determine the Bond Behaviour of GFRP Bars to Concrete: An Experimental Investigation, Buildings 13 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13112896.

[35] L. Gebhard, L. Esposito, C. Menna, J. Mata-Falcón, Inter-laboratory study on the influ-ence of 3D concrete printing set-ups on the bond behaviour of various reinforcements, Cement and Concrete Composites 133 (2022) 104660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104660.

[36] J. Duan, S. Sun, S. Chi, C. Hu, C. Ling, H. Fu, Z. Han, Effect of process parameters on forming quality and flexural strength of continuous fiber reinforced cement-based 3D printed composites, Construction and Building Materials 438 (2024) 137241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137241.

[37] S.A. Mirdehghan, Fibrous polymeric composites, (n.d.) 1–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824381-7.00012-3.

[38] Y. Liu, B. Zwingmann, M. Schlaich, Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer for Cable Struc-tures—A Review, Polymers 7 (2015) 2078–2099. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym7101501.

[39] Y. Li, J. Zhang, Y. He, G. Huang, J. Li, Z. Niu, B. Gao, A review on durability of basalt fiber reinforced concrete, Composites Science and Technology 225 (2022) 109519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109519.

[40] Q. Zu, M. Solvang, H. Li, Commercial Glass Fibers, (n.d.) 1–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72200-5_1.

[41] T.K. Das, P. Ghosh, N.Ch. Das, Preparation, development, outcomes, and application versatility of carbon fiber-based polymer composites: a review, Adv Compos Hybrid Ma-ter 2 (2019) 214–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-018-0072-z.

[42] P. Lauff, P. Pugacheva, M. Rutzen, U. Weiß, O. Fischer, D. Volkmer, M.A. Peter, C.U. Grosse, Evaluation of the Behavior of Carbon Short Fiber Reinforced Concrete (CSFRC) Based on a Multi-Sensory Experimental Investigation and a Numerical Multiscale Ap-proach, Materials (Basel, Switzerland) 14 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14227005.

[43] R. Khan, Fiber bridging in composite laminates: A literature review, Composite Structures 229 (2019) 111418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111418.

[44] P. Penzel, M. May, L. Hahn, S. Scheerer, H. Michler, M. Butler, M. Waldmann, M. Curbach, C. Cherif, V. Mechtcherine, Bond Modification of Carbon Rovings through Pro-filing, Materials (Basel, Switzerland) 15 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15165581.

[45] J.D. Ortiz, S.S. Khedmatgozar Dolati, P. Malla, A. Nanni, A. Mehrabi, FRP-Reinforced/Strengthened Concrete: State-of-the-Art Review on Durability and Mechani-cal Effects, Materials (Basel, Switzerland) 16 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16051990.

[46] J.-P. Pascault, R.J.J. Williams, Overview of thermosets: structure, properties and pro-cessing for advanced applications, (n.d.) 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857097637.1.3.

[47] A. Szewczak, G. Łagód, Adhesion of Modified Epoxy Resin to a Concrete Surface, Mate-rials (Basel, Switzerland) 15 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15248961.

[48] EN 196-1:2016-11, Methods of testing cement - Part 1: Determination of strength; Ger-man version EN 196-1:2016, DIN Media GmbH, Berlin, n.d. https://doi.org/10.31030/2482416.

[49] M. Sando, D. Stephan, The development of a fly ash-based geopolymer for extrusion-based 3D printing, along with a printability prediction method, Case Studies in Construc-tion Materials 21 (2024) 03407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03407.

[50] A. Badanoiu, J. Holmgren, Cementitious composites reinforced with continuous carbon fibres for strengthening of concrete structures, Cement and Concrete Composites 25 (2003) 387–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(02)00054-9.

[51] B. Banholzer, Bond of a strand in a cementitious matrix, Mater Struct 39 (2006) 1015–1028. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-006-9115-y.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-12

How to Cite

Sando, M., Alves Satos, S., Worms, P., Gurlo, A., & Stephan, D. (2025). Evaluation of Continuous Epoxy-Impregnated Carbon Fibre Reinforcement in a 3D-Printable Geopolymer Composite. Open Conference Proceedings, 7. https://doi.org/10.52825/ocp.v7i.2874

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Contributions to the symposium "Visions and Strategies for Reinforcing Additively Manufactured Constructions 2025"
Received 2025-07-28
Accepted 2025-09-26
Published 2025-12-12

Funding data