Task-Based Semantic Framework for Organizing Energy Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52825/ocp.v9i.3292Keywords:
Research Data Management, Task Ontology, Open Energy Ontology (OEO), Research Software Metadata, Knowledge Graph Integration, Automated Discovery, Workflow Modeling, Semantic Interoperability, Knowledge Representation, Linked DataAbstract
Effective discovery and reuse of research software in the energy domain require rich, standardized metadata, yet software purpose is typically expressed as free text and cannot be processed automatically. We introduce the Open Energy Task Ontology, which formalizes software purpose through semantically defined research tasks organized hierarchically from abstract to highly specific activities. Tasks are represented as ontological classes with clear definitions, goals, and semantic relations, enabling machine-readable categorization, workflow construction, and automated identification of compatible software components. Beyond software, tasks serve as a unifying metadata layer for datasets, publications, researchers, and organizations, supporting cross-object discovery and integration. A prototype hierarchy, initial workflow implementations, and integration into existing knowledge-graph infrastructures demonstrate the potential of a task-centric approach to harmonize metadata and enhance interoperability in energy research.
Downloads
References
[1] Leipzig, J., Nüst, D., Hoyt, C. T., Ram, K., and Greenberg, J. (2021). The role of metada-ta in reproducible computational research. Patterns 2.
[2] Wierling, A., Schwanitz, V. J., Altinci, S., Bałazinska, M., Barber, M. J., Biresselioglu, M. E., Burger-Scheidlin, C., Celino, M., Demir, M. H., Dennis, R. et al. (2021). Fair metadata standards for low carbon energy research—a review of practices and how to advance. Energies 14, 6692.
[3] Ferenz, S., and Nieße, A. (2023). Towards improved findability of energy research soft-ware by introducing a metadata-based registry. ing. grid 1.
[4] Chang, M., Lund, H., Thellufsen, J. Z., and Østergaard, P. A. (2023). Perspectives on purpose-driven coupling of energy system models. Energy 265, 126335.
[5] The CodeMeta Project. Codemeta Terms. https://codemeta.github.io/terms/.
[6] Garijo, D., Ratnakar, V., Gil, Y., and Khider, D.. The software description ontology. Revi-sion: 1.9.0. https://w3id.org/okn/o/sd/1.9.0.
[7] bio.tools. bio.tools. https://bio.tools.
[8] Pelser, T., Weinand, J. M., Kuckertz, P., and Stolten, D. (2025). Ethos.reflow: an open-source workflow for reproducible renewable energy potential assessments. Patterns 6.
[9] Ferenz, S. (2025). ERSmeta (V0.9). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17465772
[10] Kuckertz, P., Göpfert, J., Karras, O., Neuroth, D., Schönau, J., Pueblas, R., Ferenz, S., Engel, F., Pflugradt, N., Weinand, J. M. et al. (2024). Datadesc: A framework for creating and sharing technical metadata for research software interfaces. Patterns 5.
[11] Auer, S., Oelen, A., Haris, M., Stocker, M., D’Souza, J., Farfar, K. E., Vogt, L., Prinz, M., Wiens, V., and Jaradeh, M. Y. (2020). Improving access to scientific literature with knowledge graphs. Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis 44, 516–529. https://doi.org/10.1515/bfp-2020-2042.
[12] Booshehri, M., Emele, L., Flügel, S., Förster, H., Frey, J., Frey, U., Glauer, M., Hastings, J., Hofmann, C., Hoyer-Klick, C. et al. (2021). Introducing the open energy ontology: En-hancing data interpretation and interfacing in energy systems analysis. Energy and AI 5, 100074
Published
How to Cite
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Patrick Kuckertz, Mirjam Stappel, Oliver Karras, Stephan Ferenz, Jan Göpfert, Titan Hartono, Jann M. Weinand

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Funding data
-
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Grant numbers 442146713;501865131 -
Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft
Grant numbers Energy System Design