Fiber Reinforcement of 3D Printed Concrete by Material Extrusion Toolpaths Aligned to Principal Stress Trajectories

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52825/ocp.v3i.759

Keywords:

Additive Manufacturing in Construction, Structural Design, 3D Concrete Printing, Fibre Reinforced Concrete, principal stress trajectories

Abstract

Additive manufacturing of cementitious materials is a rapidly growing branch of manufacturing both in research and industry, particularly the variant of material deposition by extrusion. This process results in a strong anisotropy in mechanical properties, owing largely to the interfaces between adjacent filaments. This anisotropy is even more pronounced when fiber reinforced mortars or continuous entrained reinforcement components such as cables are used. To exploit orientation-dependent performance, the print path can be designed to align with the principal (tensile) stress trajectories. However, obtaining an appropriate print path based on this concept poses several challenges, related to the filling of intermediate spaces between two trajectories. In this paper, an approach for planning such a robot toolpath is presented, elaborated, and illustrated by means of a case study on a well-known reference case. The main features of the tool planning method are the relaxation of the offset width, the avoidance of toolpaths with acute angles by intersecting offset curves, and a continuous toolpath.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

G. Ma, R. A. Buswell, W. R. L. da Silva, L. Wang, J. Xu, and S. Z. Jones, “Technology Readiness: A Global Snapshot of 3D Concrete Printing and the Frontiers for Development,” Cem. Concr. Res., vol. 156, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106774.

T. T. Le et al., “Hardened Properties of High-Performance Printing Concrete,” Cem. Concr. Res., vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 558–566, 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.12.003.

V. N. Nerella, S. Hempel, and V. Mechtcherine, “Effects of Layer-Interface Properties on Mechanical Performance of Concrete Elements Produced by Extrusion-Based 3D-Printing,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 205, pp. 586–601, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.235.

R. J. M. Wolfs, F. P. Bos, and T. A. M. Salet, “Hardened Properties of 3D Printed Concrete: The Influence of Process Parameters on Interlayer Adhesion,” Cem. Concr. Res., vol. 119, pp. 132–140, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.02.017.

A. V. Rahul, M. Santhanam, H. Meena, and Z. Ghani, “Mechanical Characterization of 3D Printable Concrete,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 227, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116710.

C. Joh, J. Lee, T. Q. Bui, J. Park, and I.-H. Yang, “Buildability and Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Concrete,” Materials, vol. 13, no. 21, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13214919.

M. Meurer and M. Claßen, “Mechanical Properties of Hardened 3D Printed Concretes and Mortars: Development of a Consistent Experimental Characterization Strategy,” Materials, vol. 14, no. 4, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14040752.

V. Mechtcherine et al., “Integrating Reinforcement in Digital Fabrication with Concrete: A Review and Classification Framework,” Cem. Concr. Compos., vol. 119, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.103964.

S. C. Figueiredo et al., “Mechanical Behavior of Printed Strain Hardening Cementitious Composites,” Materials, vol. 13, no. 10, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13102253.

P. Lauff and O. Fischer, “Effizienter Ultrahochleistungsbeton mit innovativer trajektorienorientierter „Bewehrung“,” ce papers, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 82–88, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/cepa.976.

F. P. Bos, Z. Y. Ahmed, R. J. M. Wolfs, and T. A. M. Salet, “3D Printing Concrete with Reinforcement,” in High Tech Concrete: Where Technology and Engineering Meet, Maastricht, NL, 2017, pp. 2484–2493.

V. Mechtcherine, A. Michel, M. Liebscher, and T. Schmeier, “Extrusion-Based Additive Manufacturing with Carbon Reinforced Concrete: Concept and Feasibility Study,” Materials, vol. 13, no. 11, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13112568.

L. Demont, N. Ducoulombier, R. Mesnil, and J.-F. Caron, “Flow-Based Pultrusion of Continuous Fibers for Cement-Based Composite Material and Additive Manufacturing: Rheological and Technological Requirements,” Compos. Struct., vol. 262, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113564.

M. Bi et al., “Continuous Contour-Zigzag Hybrid Toolpath for Large Format Additive Manufacturing,” Addit. Manuf., vol. 55, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2022.102822.

X. Chen, G. Fang, W.-H. Liao, and C. C. Wang, “Field-Based Toolpath Generation for 3D Printing Continuous Fibre Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites,” Addit. Manuf., vol. 49, p. 102470, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.102470.

X. Guidetti, E. C. Balta, Y. Nagel, H. Yin, A. Rupenyan, and J. Lygeros, “Stress Flow Guided Non-Planar Print Trajectory Optimization for Additive Manufacturing of Anisotropic Polymers,” Addit. Manuf., vol. 72, p. 103628, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2023.103628.

T. Heitkamp et al., “Stress-Adapted Fiber Orientation Along the Principal Stress Directions for Continuous Fiber-Reinforced Material Extrusion,” Prog. Addit. Manuf., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 541–559, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-022-00347-x.

T. Liu et al., “Stress-Driven Infill Mapping for 3D-Printed Continuous Fiber Composite with Tunable Infill Density and Morphology,” Addit. Manuf., vol. 62, p. 103374, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2022.103374.

E. Sales, T.-H. Kwok, and Y. Chen, “Function-Aware Slicing Using Principal Stress Line for Toolpath Planning in Additive Manufacturing,” J. Manuf. Pro-cess., vol. 64, pp. 1420–1433, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.02.050.

F. Wulle, “Untersuchung der belastungsgerechten Bahnplanung für das mehrachsige Schmelzschichtverfahren für Bauteile mit Zugspannungen,” 2023.

L. Xia, S. Lin, and G. Ma, “Stress-Based Tool-Path Planning Methodology for Fused Filament Fabrication,” Addit. Manuf., vol. 32, p. 101020, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.101020.

H. Zhang, Y. Yao, Y. Ma, M. Lackner, and Y. Jiang, “A 3D Printing Tool-Path Generation Strategy Based on the Partition of Principal Stress Field for Fused Filament Fabrication,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 122, 3-4, pp. 1719–1735, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09957-9.

B. Blagojevic and O. Sawodny, “Path Planning for Graded Concrete Element Fabrication,” Constr. Robot., 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41693-023-00096-5.

L. Breseghello, H. Hajikarimian, H. B. Jørgensen, and R. Naboni, “3DLightBeam+: Design, Simulation, and Testing of Carbon-Efficient Reinforced 3D Concrete Printed Beams,” Eng. Struct., vol. 292, p. 116511, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116511.

L. Breseghello and R. Naboni, “Toolpath-Based Design for 3D Concrete Printing of Carbon-Efficient Architectural Structures,” Addit. Manuf., vol. 56, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2022.102872.

R. Dörrie and H. Kloft, “Force Flow Compliant Robotic Path Planning Approach for Reinforced Concrete Elements Using SC3DP,” in Third RILEM International Conference on Concrete and Digital Fabrication: Digital Concrete 2022, Loughborough, UK, 2022, pp. 370–375.

J. Liu, S. Li, K. Fox, and J. P. Tran, “3D Concrete Printing of Bioinspired Bouligand Structure: A Study on Impact Resistance,” Addit. Manuf., vol. 50, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.102544.

Published

2023-12-15

How to Cite

Auer, D., Bos, F., Olabi, M., & Fischer, O. (2023). Fiber Reinforcement of 3D Printed Concrete by Material Extrusion Toolpaths Aligned to Principal Stress Trajectories. Open Conference Proceedings, 3. https://doi.org/10.52825/ocp.v3i.759

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Contributions to the symposium "Visions and Strategies for Reinforcing Additively Manufactured Constructions 2023"
Received 2023-09-22
Accepted 2023-12-01
Published 2023-12-15

Funding data