Schema.org as a Lightweight Harmonization Approach for NFDI

Leyla Jael Castro; Juliane Fluck; Daniel Arend; Matthias Lange; Daniel Martini; Steffen Neumann; Sonja Schimmler; Dietrich Rebholz-Schuhmann

doi:10.52825/cordi.v1i.280

Authors

Leyla Jael Castro German National Library of Medicine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3986-0510
Juliane Fluck German National Library of Medicine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1379-7023
Daniel Arend Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research
Matthias Lange Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4316-078X
Daniel Martini Kuratorium für Technik und Bauwesen in der Landwirtschaft
Steffen Neumann Leibniz Institute of Plant Biochemistry https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7899-7192
Sonja Schimmler Fraunhofer Institute for Open Communication Systems https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8786-7250
Dietrich Rebholz-Schuhmann German National Library of Medicine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52825/cordi.v1i.280

Keywords:

Metadata Harmonization, Lightweight Semantics, Metadata, Metadata Schema, Bioschemas, Schema.org

Abstract

Schema.org is a controlled vocabulary that makes it easier for web pages to describe their actual content in a semantic, structured and machine-processable way. It is recognized by major search engines and data aggregators, making it easier for researchers to expose metadata describing their research outcomes. Here we present how Schema.org is used (or planned to be) by some NFDI consortia, becoming a lightweight approach to harmonize digital objects coming from different sources so they can be connected to each other in a meaningful way

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Guha RV, Brickley D, Macbeth S (2016) Schema.org. Communications of the ACM 59 (2): 44‑51. https://doi.org/10.1145/2844544

Gray A, Castro LJ, Juty N, Goble C. (2023) Schema.org for Scientific Data. Artificial Intelligence for Science. World Scientific; pp. 495–514. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811265679_0027

Benjelloun O, Chen S, Noy N. Google Dataset Search by the Numbers. 2020. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2006.06894

Gray AJG, Goble C, Jimenez RC (2017) From Potato Salad to Protein Annotation. ISWC Posters and Demo session. URL: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1963/paper579.pdf

Shepherd A et al. (2022). Science-on-Schema.org v1.3.0. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6502539

Wu M, Juty N, RDA Research Metadata Schemas WG, Collins J, Duerr R, Ridsdale C, et al. (2022). Guidelines for publishing structured metadata on the Web. RDA. https://doi.org/10.15497/RDA00066

Caracciolo, C., Stellato, A., Morshed, A., Johannsen, G., Rajbhandari, S., Jaques, Y., & Keizer, J. (2013). The AGROVOC Linked Dataset. Semantic Web, 4(3), 341–348. https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-130106

Pommier C, Gruden K, Junker A et al. (2021). ELIXIR Plant sciences 2020-2023 Roadmap. F1000Research 2021, 10(ELIXIR):145 https://doi.org/10.7490/f1000research.1118482.1

Tietz T, Bruns S, Sack H, Posthumus E. (version 1.1) NFDI4Culture Ontology. Available at https://nfdi4culture.de/ontology

García, L. J., Giraldo, O. L., Castro, A. G., & Dumontier, M. (2017). Bioschemas: schema. org for the Life Sciences. In SWAT4LS. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2042/paper33.pdf

Michel, F. (2018). Bioschemas & Schema. org: a lightweight semantic layer for life sciences websites. Biodiversity Information Science and Standards, 2, e25836. https://doi.org/10.3897/biss.2.25836

Castro LJ, Palagi PM, Beard N, Attwood TK, Brazas MD. (2022) Bioschemas Training Profiles: A set of specifications for standardizing training information to facilitate the discovery of training programs and resources. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.24.516513

Schema.org as a Lightweight Harmonization Approach for NFDI

Authors

DOI:

Keywords:

Abstract

Downloads

References

Downloads

Published

How to Cite

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

License

Funding data