FAIR Assessment Practices

Experiences From KonsortSWD and BERD@NFDI

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52825/cordi.v1i.344

Keywords:

FAIR principles, FAIR assessment, RDA FAIR Data Maturity Model, Automated FAIR assessment tool

Abstract

The poster presents FAIR assessment experiences in the context of the two NFDI consortia KonsortSWD and BERD@NFDI, employing the established Research Data Alliance's FAIR Data Maturity Model (RDA-FDMM) and the F-UJI Tool, an automated solution. RDA-FDMM, a manual technique, is more comprehensive, while the automated F-UJI tool effectively detects areas of improvement in metadata presentation that automated means can address. Our experiences highlight the need to examine both machine-readable as well as non-machine-readable elements and acknowledge automated tools' limitations, while valuing their insights. As the research ecosystem advances, metadata representation should be made increasingly machine-readable. We recommend a "FAIR by design" approach from the beginning to ensure alignment with FAIR principles in project outcomes. Continuous assessments during a project’s lifetime promote ongoing research data infrastructure improvements within the NFDI consortia context, contributing to NFDI infrastructure innovation and optimization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M. D. Wilkinson et al., “The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship,” Sci Data, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 160018, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18.

Research Data Alliance FAIR Data Maturity Model Working Group, “FAIR Data Maturity Model: specification and guidelines,” 2020, doi: 10.15497/RDA00050.

C.-P. Klas, M. Zloch, J. S. Bach, E. Baran, and P. Mutschke, “KonsortSWD Measure 5.1: PID Service for variables report,” Zenodo, Mar. 2022. doi: 10.5281/ZENODO.6397367.

A. Devaraju et al., “From Conceptualization to Implementation: FAIR Assessment of Re-search Data Objects,” Data Science Journal, vol. 20, p. 4, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.5334/dsj-2021-004.

A. Devaraju and P. Herterich, “D4.1 Draft Recommendations on Requirements for Fair Datasets in Certified Repositories,” Feb. 2020, doi: 10.5281/ZENODO.3678715.

European Commission. Directorate General for Research and Innovation., Visionary Ana-lytics., DANS., DCC., and EFIS., European Research Data Landscape: final report. LU: Publications Office, 2022. Accessed: Aug. 18, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/3648.

J. S. Bach, C.-P. Klas, B. Mathiak, Y. Zhang, and P. Mutschke. “FAIRness assessment: a comparison of the RDA model and the F-UJI Automated tool report,” Zenodo, 2023, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8308902.

M. D. Wilkinson et al., “Evaluating FAIR maturity through a scalable, automated, commu-nity-governed framework,” Sci Data, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 174, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1038/s41597-019-0184-5.

T. Rosnet, V. Lefort, M.-D. Devignes, and A. Gaignard, “FAIR-Checker, a web tool to support the findability and reusability of digital life science resources,” Jul. 2021, doi: 10.5281/ZENODO.5914307.

A. Ganske et al., “ATMODAT Standard (v3.0),” 2021, doi: 10.35095/WDCC/ATMODAT_STAN

DARD_EN_V3_0.

Universidade Federal da Paraíba (PPGCI/MPGOA - UFPB), “FairDataBR: a tool for da-tasets evaluation”. https://wrco.ufpb.br/fair/.

Australian Research Data Commons (ARDC), “ARDC FAIR data self-assessment tool,” 2022, https://ardc.edu.au/resource/fair-data-self-assessment-tool.

Data Archiving and Networked Services, “SATIFYD: self-assessment tool to improve the fairness of your dataset,” https://satifyd.dans.knaw.nl.

Data Archiving and Networked Services, “Fairaware: your first step towards your FAIR data(set),” https://fairaware.dans.knaw.nl/.

WDS/RDA Assessment of Data Fitness for Use WG, “WDS/RDA Assessment of Data Fitness for Use WG Outputs and Recommendations”, doi: 10.15497/RDA00034.

C. Bahim et al., “The FAIR Data Maturity Model: An Approach to Harmonise FAIR As-sessments,” Data Science Journal, vol. 19, p. 41, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.5334/dsj-2020-041.

J. Yu and S. Cox, “5-Star Data Rating Tool.” CSIRO, 2017. doi: 10.4225/08/5A12348F8567B.

D. J. B. Clarke et al., “FAIRshake: Toolkit to Evaluate the FAIRness of Research Digital Resources,” Cell Systems, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 417–421, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2019.09.011.

J. Saldanha Bach, C.-P. Klas, and P. Mutschke, “Application of ‘RDA FAIR Data Maturi-ty Model’ to assess the PID registration service in terms of FAIRness,” Oct. 2022, doi: 10.5281/ZENODO.7409651.

DataCite Metadata Working Group, “DataCite Metadata Schema Documentation for the Publication and Citation of Research Data and Other Research Outputs v4.4,” p. 82 pag-es, 2021, doi: 10.14454/3W3Z-SA82.

E. Schultes, Official GO FAIR Foundation icons for the Three-Point FAIRification Framework. Zenodo, 2021. doi: 10.5281/ZENODO.4678333.

A. Devaraju and R. Huber, “F-UJI : An Automated Assessment Tool for Improving the FAIRness of Research Data,” Sep. 2020, doi: 10.5281/ZENODO.4068347.

A. Cavoukian, “Privacy by Design (PDF)”, Information and Privacy Commissioner, https://iapp.org/media/pdf/resource_center/pbd_implement_7found_principles.pdf.

P. Hustinx, “Privacy by design: delivering the promises,” IDIS, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 253–255, Aug. 2010, doi: 10.1007/s12394-010-0061-z.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-07

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Poster presentations II (Call for Papers)
Received 2023-04-25
Accepted 2023-06-30
Published 2023-09-07

Funding data