A Framework for Large-Scale Structural Applications of 3D Printed Concrete: the Case of a 29 m Bridge in the Netherlands

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52825/ocp.v1i.74

Keywords:

3D Concrete printing, Bridge, Protocol, Testing, Mock-up

Abstract

In this work, a framework for large-scale structural applications of 3D printed concrete is presented. The steps in this framework, consisting of a design phase, testing phase and manufactur-ing phase, towards a final output were presented and discussed theoretically. The framework was then applied to the case of a 29 m 3D printed bridge, constructed in the Netherlands. The full application of the framework illustrates that despite the absence of standards, it is possible to safely apply 3D printed structures in practice. With the gradual increase of testing data expected to become available over the coming years, the extent of the application of the framework can be reduced step-by-step.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

McKinsey Global Institute, “Reinventing Construction: A Route To Higher Productivity”, McKinsey Co., p20, 2017.

P.Gerbert, S. Castagnino, C. Rothballer, and A. Renz, “Shaping the Future of Construction”, World Econ. Forum, 1–64, 2016.

T. Ngo, A. Kashani, G. Imbalzano, K. Nguyen, and D. Hui, “Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges”, Composites Part B: Engineering, 143,172–196, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012.

F. Craveiro, J. Duarte, H. Bartolo, and P. Bartolo, “Additive manufacturing as an enabling technology for digital construction: A perspective on Construction 4.0”, Autom. Constr., 103, 251–267, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.03.011

N. Labonnote, A. Rønnquist, B. Manum, and P. Rüther, “Additive construction: State-of-the-art, challenges and opportunities”, Automation in Construction, 72, 347–366, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.08.006.

B. Lu et al., “A systematical review of 3D printable cementitious materials”, Constr. Build. Mater. 207, 477–490, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.144.

F. Bos, R. Wolfs, Z. Ahmed, and T. Salet, “Additive manufacturing of concrete in construction: potentials and challenges of 3D concrete printing”, Virtual Phys. Prototyp., 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2016.1209867.

S. Paul, G. van Zijl, and I. Gibson, “A review of 3D concrete printing systems and materials properties: current status and future research prospects”, Rapid Prototyp. J. 24(4), 784–798, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-09-2016-0154.

T. Salet, Z. Ahmed, F. Bos, and H. Laagland, “Design of a 3D printed concrete bridge by testing”, Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 13(3), 222–236, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2018.1476064.

G. Vantyghem, W. De Corte, E. Shakour, O. Amir, “3D printing of a post-tensioned concrete girder designed by topology optimization”, Autom. Constr. 112, 103084, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103084.

K. Kinomura, S. Murata, Y. Yamamoto, H. Obi, and A. Hata, “Application of 3D Printed Segments Designed by Topology Optimization Analysis to a Practical Scale Prestressed Pedestrian Bridge”, In F. Bos, S. Lucas, R. Wolfs, & T. Salet (Eds.), Second RILEM International Conference on Concrete and Digital Fabrication: Digital Concrete 2020 (pp. 790-803). (RILEM Bookseries; Vol. 28), Springer, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49916-7_66.

F. Wang and M. Hannafin, “Design-based research and technology-Enhanced Learning Environments”, Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 53(4), 5–23, 2005.

B. Ritland, “The role of design in research: The integrative learning design framework”, Educ. Res. 32, 21–24, 2003, doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001021.

B. Fishman, R. Marx, P. Blumenfeld, J. Krajcik, and E. Soloway, “Creating a Framework for Research on Systemic Technology Innovations”, J. Learn. Sci. 13(1), 43–76, 2004, doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1301_3.

F. Bos, R. Wolfs, Z. Ahmed, and T. Salet, “Large Scale Testing of Digitally Fabricated Concrete (DFC) Elements”, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99519-9_12.

http://www.michielvanderkley.nl/bridge-project/ [Online] [Accessed: 24-Feb-2020].

R. Wolfs, F. Bos, and T. Salet, “Hardened properties of 3D printed concrete: The influence of process parameters on interlayer adhesion’, Cem. Concr. Res.119, 132–140 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.02.017.

D. Asprone, C. Menna, F. Bos, T. Salet, J. Mata-Falcón, and W. Kaufmann, ‘Rethinking reinforcement for digital fabrication with concrete’, Cem.Concr. Res., 112, 111–121, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.05.020.

EN 1990: Eurocode - Basis of structural design’, 2002

Z. Ahmed A. Biffi, L. Hass, F. Bos, and T. Salet, 3D Concrete Printing - Free Form Geometries with Improved Ductility and Strength. In F. Bos, S. Lucas, R. Wolfs, & T. Salet (Eds.), Second RILEM International Conference on Concrete and Digital Fabrication: Digital Concrete 2020 (pp. 741-756). (RILEM Bookseries; Vol. 28). Springer, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49916-7_74.

F. Bos, R. Wolfs, L. Hermens, and T. Salet “The influence of material temperature on the in-print strength and stability of a 3D print mortar” In A. Zingoni (Ed.), Advances in Engineering Materials, Structures and Systems: Innovations, Mechanics and Applications - Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Structural Engineering, Mechanics and Computation, 2019 (pp. 425-430). CRC Press/Balkema., doi: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429426506-76.

Published

2022-02-15

How to Cite

Ahmed, Z., Wolfs, R., Bos, F., & Salet, T. (2022). A Framework for Large-Scale Structural Applications of 3D Printed Concrete: the Case of a 29 m Bridge in the Netherlands. Open Conference Proceedings, 1, 5–19. https://doi.org/10.52825/ocp.v1i.74

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Architecture and Reinforcement
Received 2021-09-30
Accepted 2022-01-13
Published 2022-02-15